Lewis Hamilton fears Mercedes’ refusal to allow him to leave his contract prematurely will put him on the backfoot at Ferrari.
The 39-year-old, who is entering the final two races of his 12-season career with the Silver Arrows, had been earmarked by Ferrari for an end-of-season test in Abu Dhabi following next weekend’s concluding round, also in the desert.
However, Mercedes boss Toto Wolff blocked Hamilton from being released early, with the seven-time world champion under contract to fulfil sponsorship commitments in December.
“I know (Ferrari team principal) Fred (Vasseur) wanted it to happen,” said Hamilton, who will make his Ferrari debut at next year’s first round in Melbourne on March 16.
Two to go ✌️ pic.twitter.com/Ba6kyeTXoB
— Mercedes-AMG PETRONAS F1 Team (@MercedesAMGF1) November 27, 2024
“For me, I was in two minds. Driving the red car for the first time in Abu Dhabi didn’t excite me. In a perfect world you would drive it and not be seen.
“When I did raise it with Toto they already had plans that I have got to see the sponsors and say my farewells. I don’t think it would have been allowed, even if I asked, because I am contracted with the team until December 31. That is totally fine.
“But am I missing out on something? For sure. It definitely delays the process and makes the start of the year harder but we will do our best to recover.”
Hamilton has won twice in his final season with Mercedes, and finished runner-up to team-mate George Russell last weekend in Las Vegas.
“I woke up this morning and Toto and I were texting and we want to finish on a high,” added the British driver.
“All I want is that we give it our absolute all, which I know we will. These two races will not define anything in the future or our past – we have done everything and more that we set out to do – but it would be great to get a win again.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here