Jordan Cox has emerged as an injury doubt ahead of his planned Test debut against New Zealand next week, after sustaining a hand injury in the nets.
With Jamie Smith back home awaiting the birth of his first child, Cox was ready to deputise as wicketkeeper in the three-match series which begins in Christchurch on Wednesday.
But the 24-year-old was hit on the right glove while batting in warm-ups on day two of their warm-up match in Queenstown and was later sent for X-rays after the pain failed to settle.
Ollie Pope, an occasional keeper who has been picked three times behind the stumps in his 52 Tests, stood in and would be pressed into action again in the first Test if Cox was to be ruled out.
Back in an England shirt again 😍@Jimmy9 helping out the boys in the warm-up game 💪 pic.twitter.com/aUdYCZf21x
— England Cricket (@englandcricket) November 23, 2024
England would likely add a replacement for the second and third Tests if that happened, with Phil Salt a likely candidate despite his involvement in the Abu Dhabu T10.
The likes of Durham’s Ollie Robinson and Somerset’s James Rew could also come under consideration, while experienced duo Jonny Bairstow and Ben Foakes were axed in favour of Smith earlier this year.
The injury also meant England were forced to hastily shift their plans on Sunday morning, with captain Ben Stokes taking the field at the Sir John Davies Oval having previously opted to sit out the game.
With the likes of Zak Crawley and Harry Brook also netting in the morning and squad members Jacob Bethell and Rehan Ahmed linking up with their team-mates on Monday having taken part in the white-ball tour of the West Indies, England had to call upon a familiar face to make up the numbers.
Record wicket-taker James Anderson, who is the team’s bowling coach after being ushered into retirement during the summer but insists he feels ready to continue his playing career somewhere at the age of 42, donned the England whites once again to help out for a few overs at the start of play.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here