England and South Africa clash for the first time since their thunderous encounter at the 2023 World Cup when they collide at the Allianz Stadium on Saturday.
Here, the PA news agency examines five talking points heading into the penultimate match of the Autumn Nations Series.
Salvage operation
Redemption is the prize at stake for England as they target the victory that would rescue their autumn.
Narrow defeats to New Zealand and Australia have extended their losing run to four Tests and for the first time questions are being asked of head coach Steve Borthwick, drawing the response from the Rugby Football Union that he has its “100 per cent support”.
Toppling the all-conquering back-to-back world champions and Japan a week later would salvage the campaign, but lose on Saturday and England will have their backs to the wall heading into the Six Nations.
Rassie holds court
With Borthwick starting to feel the heat, South Africa head coach Rassie Erasmus was happy to twist the knife.
The canny mastermind of the Springboks’ 2019 and 2023 World Cup triumphs said that Borthwick is “under pressure” after losing twice already this month and that in this situation an unsupportive union chief executive “can make you feel like you have got a gun against your head”.
Erasmus also railed against South Africa having one less day of preparation than England, noted the confidence shown by wing Tommy Freeman in a home win and questioned whether the hosts are fit enough to execute their ‘blitz’ defence for an entire match. It was classic Erasmus mind games.
Grudge match
England and South Africa went toe-to-toe at last autumn’s World Cup (Mike Egerton/PA)A fierce rivalry has been given extra spice by last autumn’s World Cup semi-final that was edged 16-15 by the Springboks courtesy of a late Handre Pollard penalty.
That stormy encounter became the subject of a bitter race row after England’s Tom Curry claimed that Bongi Mbonambi had called him a “white ****”, an allegation the South Africa hooker denied.
Curry’s absence for the rematch because of concussion has prevented that saga from being revisited in detail this week, but the bad blood from the game lingers even if some of its main protagonists are missing.
Lord of the skies
Of the four changes made to England’s line-up, it is Freddie Steward’s recall at full-back that has the greatest significance.
A new law directive designed to make aerial duels more competitive has placed a premium on ability in the air and there are few better equipped to deal with the barrage of contestable kicks expected from South Africa than the 6’5” Steward. George Furbank has had a quiet autumn but he also makes way in a horses for courses selection.
Australia’s towering rugby league convert Joseph Suaalii was used to great effect at Twickenham last Saturday, especially at restarts, and Steward is expected to be similarly involved.
Manie’s shot at redemption
South Africa have made 12 changes following their 32-15 victory over Scotland on Sunday, fielding their strongest available starting XV and opting for a conventional five-three split between forwards and backs on the bench.
Manie Libbok’s return at fly-half in place of the ultra-reliable Pollard signals the intent to attack England with the ball in hand as well as in the air.
And with the dynamic Libbok being replaced after 31 dismal minutes of the semi-final 12 months ago, he has been given a shot at redemption. “We like to give a guy a second chance,” said Erasmus.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here