Liam Livingstone lamented the importance of the toss after England sank to a fifth successive series loss in the Caribbean as the West Indies cruised to an eight-wicket triumph in the ODI decider.
After Livingstone called incorrectly in Barbados, England stumbled to 24 for four on an initially tricky pitch to bat, offering tennis ball bounce and lateral movement for the Windies seamers.
England recovered to post 263 for eight but batting conditions had eased significantly when the reply began under lights, with the tourists having to contend with the evening dew as Brandon King and Keacy Carty made centuries to get the Windies home and hosed with seven overs to spare.
As the hosts celebrated a 2-1 win, stand-in England captain Livingstone pointed out that the team that won the toss won the match on each occasion, with the side that had to bat first in two ODIs in Antigua and one here at a distinct disadvantage.
“The conditions weren’t very favourable to the team bowling second,” he said. “It’s no excuse, we didn’t get enough runs but ultimately if we’d have got 350, I don’t think it would have mattered.
“The pitch went from being so slow to start with to being absolutely drenched at the end. Both balls were soaking, we changed it halfway through and that was soaking within an over as well.
“I’ve played a lot of cricket in the world and I don’t think I’ve ever played in a game where conditions have changed so much from one innings to the next.
“There’s no surprise that the team who the toss twice in the series won. This time of year out here, it’s pretty difficult to bat first and defend a score.”
Will Jacks and Livingstone, fresh from his match-winning 124 not out in Antigua at the weekend, were both caught behind aiming drives to deliveries that moved away a fraction and caught the edge.
There was little Jordan Cox could do after getting a glove to a brute of a lifter from Alzarri Joseph, while Jordan Bethell was well caught by Roston Chase as England were four down inside the powerplay.
Phil Salt batted against type as he curbed his attacking instincts to register a mature 74 off 108 balls while Dan Mousley collected his first international fifty with 57 off 70 deliveries.
Jamie Overton, with 32 off 21, and Jofra Archer, 38 not out off 17 balls, made explosive cameos at the back end but England’s bowlers were largely ineffective and put to the sword by King and Carty.
England lost both white-ball series last year, as well as in Tests and T20s in 2022, while this was a 13th reverse in 20 ODIs for a side that have given youth and inexperience a chance on this visit.
“We’re disappointed,” Livingstone said. “We’ve got a lot of young boys on this trip who have hopefully learnt a hell of a lot about playing international cricket. Hopefully, that will stand us in good stead.
“I feel like we’ve taken another step forward in the way we want to play our cricket and we’ve got a lot of people to come back into this squad moving forward.”
Livingstone was initially dropped ahead of an ODI series against Australia in September, only to be recalled and he has since breathed fresh life back into his 50-over career with some stunning knocks.
“I think (his ODI career) was pretty much dead three months ago,” the 31-year-old added. “I’m enjoying my cricket, I feel like I’m playing really well with the bat. That’s all I can do.
“I’m at an age now where I don’t control my career. If I get selected to play, I’ll do my best to try and win games for England, if I don’t get selected then I don’t get selected. I’ve proved over the last two series that I’m good enough to be in this team.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here