Coco Gauff claimed just a second win in 13 meetings against Iga Swiatek to book her spot in the semi-finals of the WTA Finals in Saudi Arabia.
The American’s 6-3 6-4 victory also ensures Aryna Sabalenka will finish the year as world number one, with defending champion Swiatek no longer able to overtake the Australian Open and US Open winner.
The Pole, playing just her second match under new coach Wim Fissette, can still join Gauff in the semi-finals but she will need to beat Jessica Pegula in her final match.
What a match 🤩
Coco Gauff beats Iga Swiatek 6-3 6-4! pic.twitter.com/DwDwaeS5Sd
— Sky Sports Tennis (@SkySportsTennis) November 5, 2024
Gauff’s only previous win over Swiatek came in Cincinnati last summer, with all 11 of her defeats suffered in straight sets.
Both players made errors throughout, and Gauff served 10 double faults in the second set, but she proved the stronger in the end, letting out a huge roar after breaking serve in the final game.
“It feels great,” she said in her on-court interview. “I had confidence going in, I felt like I was playing great tennis and even when I was playing a little bit sloppy the games that I lost were still going to deuce.
picture perfect backhand 🖼️@CocoGauff | #WTAFinalsRiyadh pic.twitter.com/ooALd9BUHD
— wta (@WTA) November 5, 2024
“That gave me confidence. If I stayed solid, I knew I had the chance to close out the match.”
In the earlier match, Wimbledon champion Barbora Krejcikova claimed her first WTA Finals singles victory and kept her semi-final hopes alive by beating Pegula 6-3 6-3.
The Czech, who lost all three matches on her only previous singles appearance, will take on Gauff on Thursday while Pegula can no longer progress.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here