Sale Sharks and England forward Jonny Hill has received a 10-week ban, four of which are suspended, after accepting a charge that he physically abused a spectator.
Hill, who has not played for Sale this season, will be available from December 7.
He appeared before an independent disciplinary panel for an alleged breach of the Rugby Football Union’s rule 5.12 – conduct prejudicial to the interests of the game and/or Union – in that he was alleged to have physically abused a spectator following Sale’s Gallagher Premiership play-off defeat at Bath on June 1.
The RFU said that Hill accepted the charge.
In a statement released by the RFU, panel chair Philip Evans KC said: “The panel concluded the appropriate starting point was a 20-week suspension from playing.
“They also found the circumstances of this case to be exceptional and as a consequence, and because of the substantial mitigation available to Jonny Hill, that starting point was reduced to 10 weeks, four of which will be suspended until the conclusion of the 25/26 season.
“In addition, he is required to give a presentation to young players at the club which is to be recorded and provided to the RFU.”
A 28-year-old supporter had claimed he was grabbed around the throat and left with a cut above his eye after an altercation with Hill at the end of the play-off clash.
Hill missed the game through injury and was watching from the stands. He allegedly became involved with the man as he left his seat and walked down the steps following his side’s 31-23 defeat.
The fan, who did not wish to be identified, told reporters he was grabbed around the throat and left with a cut above his eye after his sunglasses were broken.
Hill suffered a season-ending ruptured patella tendon in January, but he is now understood to be fully fit again.
Commenting on the judgement, Sale said: “Both the club and player accept the ruling made by the RFU disciplinary panel, and we now look forward to getting Jonny back on the pitch in a Sale Sharks shirt as soon as possible.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here