A five-match stadium ban imposed on Nottingham Forest owner Evangelos Marinakis will stay in place after an appeal against the sanction was dismissed.
The Greek shipping magnate was sanctioned for misconduct on October 18, with the written reasons revealing the following week that the punishment was imposed for spitting on the floor in front of the match officials following Forest’s match against Fulham on September 28.
Forest immediately indicated their intention to appeal, but the Football Association announced on Monday that an appeal board had dismissed the challenge.
The FA said the written reasons for the appeal board’s dismissal would be published in due course.
Forest have been contacted for comment regarding the appeal dismissal.
The original independent commission found there was “no excuse” for such “an egregious display of disrespectful behaviour” by Marinakis, and said it could “fuel disrespect towards match officials”.
The club have also separately appealed against a £750,000 fine imposed upon them after they posted on their official social media accounts about Stuart Attwell’s role in their defeat to Everton last season.
They said Attwell, who was the VAR for the match, had denied them three clear penalties in the match, and said they had “warned” referees body Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL) that Attwell was a Luton fan, but they had not changed the appointment.
The written reasons in that case revealed the FA sought a fine of at least £1million in relation to those comments, because they attacked the integrity of an official and the game of football as a whole “on an unparalleled scale”.
Forest said the £750,000 fine was “disproportionate”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here