Mark Allen peeled off two century breaks to ease into the British Open third round, one day after complaining the table he had played on should be “burned”.
Allen won a final-frame shootout in his tournament opener against Gary Wilson before the Northern Irishman described conditions at the Centaur Arena in Cheltenham as “absolutely embarrassing”.
The world number three, who apologised to interviewer Rob Walker on X for his outburst, had few problems on Tuesday as he defeated the Republic of Ireland’s Aaron Hill 4-1, book-ending the win with ton-plus breaks.
Allen started the match with breaks of 102 and 56 before moving to the brink of victory by taking a scrappy third frame. After losing the fourth, a 101 break sealed victory for Allen.
Judd Trump saw off Wales’ Ryan Day 4-2 but the world number one was unable to claim the century break he needed to become just the third player in history to reach 1,000 in his career.
Trump moved to 999 centuries on Monday but a last-frame 80 was the closest he came to joining Ronnie O’Sullivan, who achieved the mark in 2019, and John Higgins, who did so at the English Open last week.
Neil Robertson continued his good recent form with a 4-1 win over Chris Totten, courtesy of breaks of 100, 99, 86 and 53.
The Australian, who claimed his first ranking title since the 2022 Tour Championship at the English Open on Sunday, said on World Snooker’s website: “A victory after a tough time is always far sweeter.
“When you are winning regularly you can take it for granted. This one was really special. My wife and kids have seen me struggling over the last years because they were used to me winning before.”
There were wins later in the evening session for Luca Brecel, Stuart Bingham and Stephen Maguire.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here