Ian Wright branded Erling Haaland a “coward” as the fall-out continued from one of the most combustible Premier League showdowns of recent times at the Etihad Stadium on Sunday.
John Stones’ injury-time equaliser sparked a series of confrontations at the end of an already-controversial encounter that evoked memories of some of Arsenal’s previous clashes across the city at Old Trafford two decades ago.
Former Gunners striker Wright did not hold back with his criticism of Haaland, who celebrated Stones’ leveller in the eighth minute of added time by throwing the ball at the back of defender Gabriel’s head.
The Brazil international had his shirt pulled over his head in disappointment at the time and Wright, speaking via a video message on his Instagram account, said: “You know what proper boiled me up, was Haaland’s coward’s move.
“Throwing the ball in Gaby’s head when he’s not looking, when Gaby’s back’s turned to him, a real coward’s move.
“That’s what bothered me more than anything else. I thought you (Haaland) were bigger than that.”
The Football Association confirmed that Haaland will face no further action over the incident. The FA is powerless to intervene because it was reviewed via VAR at the time, and not deemed to be a red card offence.
Haaland had opened the scoring with his 100th City goal, matching Cristiano Ronaldo’s record of reaching three figures in just 105 games for a major European club.
Riccardo Calafiori curled home the equaliser in his first Gunners start and Gabriel put the visitors ahead but they were forced to play the second half with 10 men after Leandro Trossard was sent off on the stroke of half-time for kicking the ball away.
The controversy continued after the final whistle as Haaland was overhead calling former City striker Gabriel Jesus a “f***ing clown” before a tension-filled handshake with Mikel Arteta, with Haaland telling the Gunners boss to “stay humble”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here