Liverpool head coach Arne Slot admits even he was surprised by Darwin Nunez’s brilliant goal which capped a 3-0 victory over Bournemouth.
Leading by two Luis Diaz goals in as many first-half minutes, the Reds striker, on his first start since April, produced a reminder of his talent with a curling effort around Kepa Arrizabalaga that went in off the far post.
Slot was certainly not expecting the check-back and shot, especially with Mohamed Salah and Diaz in support at the time, but accepted the outcome justified the individuality.
“My first instinct was ‘Why does he shoot?’. He made the ball free and the defender was on the ground but a fraction of a second later the ball goes in off the post,” said the Dutchman.
“Maybe he is a better player than I was in the past.”
Nunez looked emotional, appearing to wipe tears from his eyes with his shirt, after scoring his first club goal in 15 appearances, most as a substitute after previous boss Jurgen Klopp appeared to finally lose patience with him towards the end of last season.
The Uruguay international has been something of a streaky player with an eye for the spectacular but Slot wants him to have greater consistency to be able to offer more to the team.
“I think with consistency you get by two things: work rate and team performance,” he added.
“If the team performance is not so good it is harder for the individual to be consistent as well.
“We have to work on the training ground and that is what we try to do every day and he showed today a good game.
“Maybe he can show it again on Wednesday (in the Carabao Cup against West Ham) but we have to see.”
Bournemouth boss Andoni Iraola admitted Liverpool’s superior cutting edge was the difference.
“The stats were quite level but they were better when it mattered,” he said.
“When the game is on the line. They were much better than us. When they had the chances they made the difference.
“They are very dangerous, they have a lot of speed, especially up front with Darwin, Luis Diaz and Mohamed Salah, they have a threat in behind.
“You look at the stats and I think we had 20 shots and seven corners. We had momentum but it had less value.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here