Sir Keir Starmer has expressed confidence that plans for an independent football regulator do not breach rules on Government interference, despite UEFA warning the move could see England banned from Euro 2028.
The Prime Minister said he was “sure” ministers could “find a way through” in talks with the governing body after it voiced concerns that the proposals could threaten the autonomy of sport.
It follows a warning from UEFA general secretary Theodore Theodoridis that the plans, set out in the Football Governance Bill, could lead to England’s exclusion from the union.
That severe sanction would mean teams would no longer be able to compete in the Champions League and other European competitions, including the Euro 2028 tournament England is set to co-host.
Asked whether he would change Government plans for a football regulator in response to UEFA’s concerns, Starmer told reporters travelling with him to Rome: “I don’t think there’s any problem with the rules, because this is a truly independent regulator.
“But as you’d expect, we’re talking to UEFA, and I’m sure we’ll find a way through this, but I’m confident that our rules are perfectly consistent, and that the regulator is truly independent.
“But of course we’re talking to UEFA to make sure that we can ensure that everything is possible.”
Asked if he was seeking to persuade UEFA that the Government’s plans did not amount to a breach of the rules, Starmer said: “I mean, I don’t think it does, I don’t think it’s a problem.
“But of course, we’ll talk to them if they’ve got concerns. I think they’ve slightly reduced their concerns as time has gone on, but obviously I’ll discuss their concerns.”
The Football Governance Bill was first introduced under the previous Tory administration and adopted by Labour after the election.
It includes measures to establish an independent regulator to address the financial resilience of clubs and prevent breakaway leagues.
Theodoridis has written to Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, in a letter reported by The Times, saying there should be “no government interference in the running of football” and that an independent regulator could lead to England’s exclusion from UEFA.
It is understood the Department for Culture, Media and Sport will respond to the letter shortly and that there have been no previous concerns raised by UEFA, which has been engaging alongside the Football Association with the new Government over the development of the Bill.
UEFA sources have indicated that it is not opposed to a regulator per se, and the letter even referenced the “collaborative dialogue” with the DCMS. However, Theodoridis did express concerns about the risk of “scope creep”.
Theodoridis said the regulator’s remit should be “strictly limited” to the long-term financial sustainability of clubs.
UEFA sought clarification around one clause in the Football Governance Bill as presented under the previous Government which obliged the regulator to consider the Government’s trade policy objectives when assessing the suitability of an owner or potential buyer of a club.
The letter also highlighted concerns around the plan to give the regulator backstop powers to impose a financial settlement between the Premier League and the EFL if they cannot agree one themselves.
Former Manchester United defender Gary Neville, who is a high-profile supporter of independent regulation, described reporting around the letter as “scaremongering”.
The Football Governance Bill was included in the King’s Speech in July, making it part of the new Labour Government’s legislative agenda for the current parliamentary session.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here