Bill Sweeney denies the Rugby Football Union has “sold out” after insurance giants Allianz bought the naming rights to Twickenham for over £100million.
From September 1 the 82,000-capacity home of English rugby will be known as ‘Allianz Stadium’ in its first rebrand since it opened in 1909 with the deal injecting cash into the elite and grassroots levels of the game.
RFU chief executive Sweeney has revealed that the decade-long partnership will provide in excess of £10million a year at a time when the sport is facing significant financial challenges.
The response to the agreement has been mixed with many supporters voicing their discontent at the name change online, particularly at the exclusion of Twickenham from the new title.
England Rugby and @allianzuknews have agreed a long-term partnership, which will see significant investment into the game at all levels with the home of England Rugby, Twickenham becoming Allianz Stadium from September.
— England Rugby (@EnglandRugby) August 5, 2024
Other treasured national sporting arenas such as Wembley, Lord’s and Wimbledon still retain their historical names, but Sweeney insists this is the right direction for the RFU to take.
“I really don’t believe we’ve sold out. It’s an iconic stadium, it’s the home of rugby. Experiences here are incredible, people love coming here,” Sweeney told the BBC.
“But we believe this will help us build on the legacy of the stadium and will take us into the future decades from here.
“The investment from Allianz will enable us to make Twickenham an even better experience for fans and players.
“We believe this is an investment into the future with the sort of partner we need to go on that journey. It’s money that we need to invest back into the game.
“It’s a multi-year commitment and it’s well over £100m, so it’s a fair value for what you’d expect for stadium naming rights these days.”
Twickenham is now the eighth sporting venue around the world to carry the Allianz branding and the RFU is the last of the four home unions to sell the naming rights to its home ground, in the process negotiating a more lucrative deal than its rivals.
The PA news agency understands that retaining Twickenham in the title was not an option if an agreement with Allianz was to be reached, with an RFU insider stating “it’s a really good deal for rugby”.
“The new name aligns with our approach to other stadium partnerships across the globe and over time it will mean the Allianz Stadium name is adopted more fully,” an Allianz spokesperson said.
“We recognise that Twickenham has an extraordinary heritage and we look forward to helping develop this iconic venue for the future.”
The partnership has received the approval of Newcastle director of rugby Steve Diamond, who recently worked for the RFU in a consultancy capacity.
“Selling the naming rights of Twickenham is magnificent for rugby, which has been through its worst period. But we are not out of the water yet,” Diamond said.
The RFU in February revealed plans to begin a £300million upgrade of Twickenham in 2027 after rejecting a proposal to make Wembley the new home of English rugby.
Buying a 50 per cent share in Wembley from the Football Association was considered by the RFU’s board in March last year before the idea was discounted without a formal approach to the FA being made.
The first fixture to be played at Twickenham under its new name is the Red Roses’ clash with New Zealand on September 14.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel