Female stars of Team GB will benefit commercially from a continued societal shift towards embracing strong, fearless women, a women’s sports consultant has said.
Great Britain’s team for the Tokyo Olympics included more women than men for the first time and helped showcase the talent of athletes such as Keely Hodgkinson, Bethany Shriever and Lauren Price.
Team GB athletes benefit from National Lottery funding via UK Sport, but the Games could also lead to some athletes increasing their earning power via sponsorship.
Sue Anstiss, the author of ‘Game On: The Unstoppable Rise of Women’s Sport’ and chief executive of the Fearless Women group, says brands will want an association with such athletes.
“They are looking to be seen as progressive and to have a sense of purpose, and they are all after that younger audience coming through who want to buy brands, and be associated with brands, that are more inclusive and more diverse,” Anstiss told the PA news agency.
“That is pushing brands to think ‘I can’t have four male athletes and one token female in my line-up, I do need to look at that equally’.
“The profile of women through social media and the ability to hone their own audience and talk directly to an audience, that has definitely shifted too.
“If you think of someone like Simone Biles, with seven million followers on Instagram, that ability to go directly to an audience is really appealing to these brands.
“Brands are waking up too to the power of female purchasers, which has always been there, but recognising that men and women feel positive towards brands that support women’s sport.”
Becky Adlington, a double gold medallist for Team GB at the Beijing Olympics, spoke before Tokyo about how she hoped the Games would tackle the stigma around sport and femininity.
Anstiss believes the qualities of female athletes are now precisely those that brands are looking for.
“Even five or 10 years ago, being what was considered conventionally attractive and feminine – the slim, blonde, leggy athlete, was likely to earn you more money in terms of endorsement and funding than being a strong powerful athlete,” she said.
“I think that stigma is changing. Brands that are celebrating everything about a strong and powerful body help to drive that change in society too.
“The women almost stand out, they are that point of difference. With someone like (BMX rider) Beth Shriever, who are making their name in a sport that has more traditionally associated with boys, there’s a chance to align yourself with an athlete who sets themselves apart from the norm.
“Through that, a brand will get that awareness and reach through those athletes who are celebrated for their skill-set and performance in a way that has been associated with men and boys.”
While Anstiss believes sponsorship earnings from men’s football will always be an outlier, she is confident that in other areas equality is more achievable.
“There’s no reason female rugby players, female cricketers and all those involved in Olympic sports shouldn’t be paid the same and be as appealing to sponsors, if not more so, because women’s sport brings so many traits to it that men’s sport doesn’t bring,” she said.
Asked about the single impact of Tokyo on female athletes’ earning power, Anstiss said: “It will contribute, but it’s a constant building, with events like The Hundred, the Women’s Super League and the Commonwealth Games next year. Tokyo – along with what we’re seeing right now and what will come next year – will be part of that transition.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here