For every Steve Davis and Stephen Hendry, snooker also boasted its bit-part players: the what-might-have-beens and never-minds, who left their own small but indelible mark upon the sport.
For the duration of the postponed World Championships, the PA news agency is turning its focus on the Crucible characters who never quite made the competition’s last three days.
Paul Hunter
Variously dubbed ‘Snooker Spice’ or ‘The Beckham of the Baize’, the colourful career of the prodigiously talented Hunter was tragically cut short by stomach cancer.
When he died in 2006, five days short of his 28th birthday, the sport came together to mourn a player who had enjoyed more success – and accrued more column inches – in his abbreviated career than most manage in a lifetime.
The blond-maned Leeds star won three Masters titles, all in final frame deciders, and reached the World Championship semi-finals in 2003, losing by another final frame decider to Ken Doherty.
Following his 2001 Masters final win over Fergal O’Brien, Hunter hit the headlines by revealing the unorthodox way in which he had sought fresh momentum after trailing 6-2 at the end of the opening session.
“Sex was the last thing on my mind,” recalled Hunter, who had retired to his dressing room with his girlfriend, Lindsey Fell. “But I had to do something to break the tension.
“It was a quick session – around 10 minutes or so – but I felt great afterwards. She jumped in the bath, I had a kip and then played like a dream.”
Hunter made a memorably disastrous appearance on the BBC’s Superstars programme in 2003. “There were 39 athletes and me,” Hunter told the Independent. “There was only me who smoked and drank.”
The Paul Hunter Classic was named in his honour in 2010. The Paul Hunter Foundation continues to give disadvantaged, able bodied and disabled youngsters an opportunity to play snooker.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here