A combined audience of around 100,000 is expected to witness two major finals in one of the biggest days of sport in Glasgow’s recent history, at least partly demonstrating the impact of professionalism on modern rugby’s spectator appeal.
While a capacity crowd of around 50,000 will be at Hampden to witness Celtic’s bid to complete a treble treble, almost as many tickets - more than 43,000 by yesterday – had been sold for the Pro14 final at their home in Parkhead, with scope for that to increase since tickets will be available on the day.
As encouraging as that might seem for other sports in this football-dominated country, it also speaks to a trend which is seeing ever more effort being placed into turning sports-lovers into spectators rather than participants.
What might be dubbed ‘Project popcorn’ seems to aspire to the American sporting model which effectively sees sporting events turned into vast marketing opportunities for those selling food and merchandise, more and more of which is controlled by the organisations staging the events.
A combination of heavy funding of athletes and, more importantly, a drive to ensure that a steady supply of high class events, was sold as an opportunity to promote healthy living in a part of the world that is blighted by childhood obesity and heart problems among adults.
Instead, whether deliberately or otherwise, a process has taken place that has the potential to exacerbate those problems since the otherwise welcome emphasis on seeking to introduce youngsters to sport seems to be stimulating more of an interest in watching rather than playing.
Rugby’s response over the past quarter of a century to opening the sport up to professional seems to illustrate that most clearly with the vast majority of clubs now fielding far fewer teams every weekend than was the case in the eighties and nineties when Scotland were winning Grand Slams and regularly contending for titles.
While considerable effort has been put into encouraging more school-children to take an interest in rugby during that period, what increasingly seems to be happening is that there is a huge drop off in involvement in the mid to late teens as those who realise that they do not have the talent or commitment levels to make it as professional players, leaving the playing of the game to the relative few who do.
Whether deliberately or accidentally, as we would all prefer to think would be the case, those promoting sport in our schools and youth clubs are effectively doing more to generate a future target audience for the marketing men than a lifelong involvement in healthy activity.
Leinster head coach Leo Cullen’s excitement on entering Celtic Park yesterday was, then, wholly understandable, but spoke to the commercial emphasis that has been an inevitable consequence of the professionalism of his sport.
“I’ve just heard they’ve over 50,000 season ticket holders here at Celtic which is an incredible number,” he observed, having also paid tribute to the vast support that has followed his team this season, including in their tens of thousands to Newcastle for the Champions Cup final a fortnight ago.
“I think every rugby club out there is dreaming of that day when you can call on 50,000 season ticket holders to support you week in, week out.
Just as was the case among the many old rugby players who advocated allowing the sport to go open back in the eighties and nineties, but now believe they had the best of it when juggling careers with sporting commitments back in those days, he might want to think about what he is wishing for.
For many of those regularly watching Leinster that may well be their only sporting activity of the week, which is a far cry from the days when rugby clubs were packed out after matches with international and sixth XV players alike.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here