Stuart Kettlewell has criticised the decision to add just two minutes to the end of his side’s defeat to Rangers at Hampden, with the Motherwell manager feeling his side were in the ascendancy and may have had a chance to nick a late equaliser.
Motherwell had grown into the second half and almost pulled level when Jack Butland pulled off a superb save from Zach Robinson’s snapshot, and Kettlewell believes the Rangers backline were looking nervy as his men threw balls into their box in the closing stages.
He was astonished to see just two minutes of stoppage time being added despite a couple of injuries and a raft of substitutions taking place, and he felt aggrieved that his team had been robbed of the chance to apply further pressure to Rangers.
“In the second half, we had numerous changes from both sides,” Kettlewell said.
“We had a situation where their centre-back goes off.
“I just felt there was more than two minutes to be played in that game. It was a real surprise for myself, and I think most of you guys as well. Whether that makes a difference in the game, I don't know. But it certainly sometimes seems that when you're looking for a bit more added time, it's not there.
“I think that possibly becomes a wee bit disrespectful to Rangers [to say they were creaking]. Whether it was the players that were creaking, or they looked nervous or whatever, I felt at that point we were just on the ascendancy.
“I just felt as if we were carrying a threat. I just felt as if we had a bit of dominance in the game. You're always looking for that five-minute spell, ten-minute spell, whatever it be, where you carry a threat.
“I felt that was slap-bang in the middle of a spell. We were all right and we were good.
“As I say, their goalkeeper looked probably more nervous at that point than ours. So, yeah, disappointed that it doesn't continue for at least maybe another minute. Possibly two.”
The injury crisis that has hit Fir Park recently deepened further still as striker Apostolos Stamatelopoulos limped from the action late in the first half on his first start for the club, and Kettlewell is fearing he may be hit with another lengthy lay-off.
“It doesn't look good,” he said.
“He had a bit of tightness in his thigh. I think he's then stopped. Sometimes we always associate it with stretching for the ball, but he actually stops and at that point, he's obviously felt a much sharper pain in his thigh.
“He seems really robust. He's played a lot of games of football. He's generally available and fit, as are a number of the guys that are out injured at this minute in time. So, yeah, we're obviously worried about it.
“I'm not going into too much more detail until we see the right specialists and get things scanned and all the rest of it. But it doesn't look great.”
Ideally, Kettlewell would like to strengthen his side in attacking areas to compensate for his long injury list, but he admits that might be difficult.
“You need resources and you need money to do so,” he said.
“That's not to say that's not a possibility, but we are going to have to shuffle things here a little bit. “We thought we'd pieced together a strong squad and tried to do a lot of that business earlier. But it doesn't just become a case of clicking our fingers to go and get the next player.
“It becomes really difficult because we're not working with an awful lot of money here to go and do that. So, we're continuing to try and come up with solutions.
“We're continuing and the chief executive and board have been fantastic to try and help us in doing that. But also, what I don't want to do is just bring another player that I don't think contributes to this as well.
“It has to be someone that fits into what we're doing here and can obviously make some sort of impact. And that's what we'll continue to do over the next couple of hours, let alone the next couple of days.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel