STEVEN Naismith today admitted that Hearts did not deserve to be awarded a penalty in their William Hill Premiership opener against Rangers – but insisted his side did enough to win the game.
Naismith appealed for a spot kick towards the end of the first-half when Connor Barron clearly handled a Yan Dhanda cross inside his own area only for referee Nick Walsh to allow play to continue.
But the former Scotland internationalist, whose team were held to a goalless draw by their Ibrox rivals in their first competitive match of the 2024/25 campaign, confessed afterwards that the match official had got the call right.
The ex-Rangers forward did, though, argue that his charges, who dominated the opening 45 minutes of the encounter with Philippe Clement’s men, should have picked up all three points.
"I don’t think it's a penalty, if I'm honest,” he said. “Last season there was a big debate. Willie (SFA head of refereeing Collum) and the referees and the league have done a lot to clear things up.
“There has been a conscious effort to stop you guys (the media) asking that question to write about it. You will stop it (the video replay), you will see it, people will say it's unnatural. But if you've played the game, there isn't much he can do so I don't think it's a penalty.”
Naismith added: “I know the headlines will all be ‘Rangers have dropped points’, but I think we should have won the game. We created good chances, had really good moments, had more of them. First half, our performance was really good.
“They then need to change what they are doing to try and get a foothold in the game and they did to a point, but it was all in front of us, never really caused us too many problems.
“They are direct so they are going to get some chances off the back of that, but I thought we played really well today. The only thing missing was a goal or two.
“There are always things in a game you can do better, but we controlled the game. But as I said it will be ‘Rangers have dropped points’. We played so well in the first half, had so much control, all that was missing was the finishing touches.
“The first month of every season is like that, you are always going to have moments where chances go abegging because everybody is not into their stride in the competitive games.
“We will take confidence from the performance, but we are not just going to go away from the game today saying, ‘Brilliant’. It is hard work over the last six weeks that we have done, the new players coming in they all contributed.”
Naismith refused to be drawn on Hearts' pursuit of Colombian left back Andres Salazar even though the defender was at Tynecastle to take in the Rangers match. "We'll see how that develops in the coming days," he said.
Meanwhile, Barron has stated that he was certain that Walsh would not give the spot kick. “I was confident it wouldn’t be a penalty,” he told Sky Sports. “My arms were right by my side, but you never know what can happen. It goes through your head a little bit but I knew I was safe.
“We didn’t get the three points so it wasn’t the perfect day for me. The result wasn't exactly what we wanted to go out and do today.
“But I think there were good bits in there that we can look at going forward and bits we can get better at. It’s going to be a long season so it’s about us picking ourselves up after games like today and making sure we correct things.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel