The Scottish FA’s head of refereeing operations has revealed broadcasters will be turned away when looking for still images of retrospective offside decisions.
Crawford Allan insists the SFA have learned a lesson following the furore that ensued after a controversial decision during the most recent Celtic vs Rangers match.
The spotlight shone on VAR after an Alistair Johnston handball inside Celtic’s penalty area, with the defender under pressure from Abdallah Sima. Willie Collum reviewed the incident but advised on-field referee Nick Walsh to continue play.
Around 15 minutes after the incident, Sky Sports moved to clear up quickly mounting controversy by highlighting Sima was in an offside position in the attacking phase of play [APP], hence the handball incident didn't matter. It's understood the broadcaster requested images with the relevant lines drawn from the SFA.
However, Allan believes such transparency only causes further backlash rather than tempering anger.
“We were trying to be as transparent and open as possible to assist the understanding of people,” said the 56-year-old. “But, for the noise that it created, it’s like, ‘Well, why would we do that again?’.
“We’ll stick to what we did at the time and then we will report the facts. I think that’s a lesson learned.
READ MORE: SPFL's seditious six should sound death knell for leadership
“Initially, yes, we thought it did provide clarity. But clearly, hindsight has shown that it didn’t. We did it with the best of intentions. We were trying to assist. But at the end of the day, all it’s done is backfire.
“From now on we’ll just say to the broadcaster, ‘If you want to look at it and show there was an offside then that’s up to you,’. We’ll tell you the facts as to what we did at the time.
“But we absolutely did it with the best of intentions. I spoke to William [Collum] and the other officials in the match many times that week after it, just to continue to reiterate our support. I know that William was grateful for that.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel