KELLE Roos has described the penalty award that allowed Rangers to score an injury-time equaliser against Aberdeen at Pittodrie on Sunday as harsh and questioned why referees allow players to block their opponents in the area at corners.
But the Dutch goalkeeper has admitted that he and his team mates have to be good enough to grind out results in games even if decisions don’t go their way and targeted a Conference League win over HJK Helsinki in Finland on Thursday night.
Roos was immense for Barry Robson’s men in the cinch Premiership match against Philippe Clement’s charges at the weekend and only conceded when the visitors’ skipper James Tavernier converted from 12 yards at the death.
The 31-year-old felt for Stefan Gartenmann, who match official Nick Walsh ruled had pulled the shirt of Connor Goldson after being urged to watch a replay on his pitchside monitor by his VAR colleague Andrew Dallas, afterwards.
READ MORE: Rangers great hits back at Aberdeen manager over penalty award claim
However, the former Derby County, Rotherham, Wimbledon, Bristol Rovers, Port Vale and Plymouth Argyle man knows that Aberdeen, who remain in ninth spot in the top flight table just three points behind bottom-placed Livingston, have to start getting results.
Asked about the penalty award, he said: "I don't want to go into it too deep. It is a frustrating one, you probably have to look at it a lot. Another question I have is if this is a foul, why are you still allowed to block people with no intent on getting the ball.
"It happens at every corner, every team does it. People use blockers, to stand still and get in the way of other people, yet that is fine. It is just very blurry which is probably why it takes so long for VAR and the referee. I think it is a very tough position.
"Also on a screen it is very hard to see what impact something has. Is it little? Or a reason to go down? I think it is difficult for them as well, but it was a harsh one for us.
"There was also a very strong performance from a lot of my defenders. Yes, I was very frustrated to concede so late in the game when we gave away chances. But, at the same time, I also felt that we gave ourselves the opportunity to deal with them.
"Stefan is good. He is a brilliant pro. It shouldn’t take away how outstanding he was. They all had a tough time against him and he probably didn't deserve this. He is obviously not happy with it, that's football. But this is where he has the experience to know what he has to do.”
Roos added: "The HJK match is something that my focus is on. We need to step away from starting to talk about ifs and buts and we could have and should have. We need to get what we deserve in games. That is what happens if you perform at the top in sport. You need to be able to take what you deserve from games."
READ MORE: Ex-Rangers chairman opens up on pain at his 'very nasty' Ibrox exit
Roos was impressed with the display of Ester Sokler – the Slovenian striker who set up Bojan Miovski for Aberdeen’s goal after making his first start for the Pittodrie club.
"I can't credit him enough,” he said. “I know from in the past that not always playing is so hard. In his position, he always gets on the pitch. But he has really kept tunnel vision and made himself ready for whenever he is needed. We called him up for a very big game and it was incredible to see that energy. He played with cleverness.
"I would have loved to see him get a reward with a goal because he deserved nothing less. It was an outstanding performance from him. I think he can be very proud of himself for being so patient and being ready for that chance.
"It is an incredible strength to have as a player. Not everything always goes your way. He has had to bite his tongue a couple of times and this is a way of showing that if you are ready this is what you put out. He probably deserved a goal, but they will come."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here