ALEX Cochrane is fully focused on the cinch Premiership match against Livingston at Tynecastle tomorrow night – and securing all three points for Hearts with a victory.
It is a month since Steven Naismith’s side last triumphed in the league and their left wing back knows it is vital they end their three game winless run and start climbing back up the top flight table.
A draw at home in the Edinburgh derby against Hibernian, a heavy loss in Gorgie to champions and top flight leaders Celtic and an agonising loss at Ibrox have led to rumblings of discontent among Jambos.
However, Cochrane has half an eye on the Viaplay Cup semi-final against Rangers at Hampden on Sunday afternoon as well and he is certain that the capital outfit can get a result despite their collapse in Govan at the weekend.
The defender, who set up his captain Lawrence Shankland for the opening goal in the fifth minute with an inch-perfect cross, was devastated when the Glasgow club scored in the 89th and 93rd minutes to snatch glory from the jaws of despair.
READ MORE: Why re-runs of The Late, Late Show can turn Rangers into title winners
But the former Brighton man believes that Hearts can draw positives from many aspects of the display and can go into the last four encounter with confidence despite the reverse they suffered in their latest outing.
"Livingston is the main focus,” he said. “But we will go in next full of belief. We did that at Ibrox and we put in a good performance for 90 minutes.
“Obviously it wasn't enough, but there were plenty of positives to take. We were 1-0 up at Ibrox for 90 minutes I thought we defended well. We also broke them too and had a few other chances.
"So there are definitely positives. It's obviously very disappointing to lose. We know that and the lads in the dressing room are gutted."
Cochrane added: "But the game is finished now and we have to learn from that five minute spell because it has cost us three points.
"When we conceded that penalty, the worst thing that should have happened was that we took a point back and moved on. We should have regrouped and tried to hang on, but it wasn’t to be.
“It was very difficult to take. But for 90 minutes or so the gameplan worked perfectly. Of course, football is longer than 90 minutes now.”
Naismith was livid when referee John Beaton gave Rangers a second spot kick with two minutes of regulation time remaining after a VAR check showed that Peter Haring had pulled down Connor Goldson.
Cochrane felt that Hearts players had been victims of infringements which went unpunished at the other end of the park and felt the crowd had perhaps influenced the match official.
The 23-year-old, though, admitted that the visitors should have been able to hang on and pick up a point after James Tavernier had levelled.
"It was something that was spoken about at half time, about the blockings,” he said. “Obviously, you know when you go to those places and the crowd are on top of the referee . . .
“Some decisions may go our way and some may not. It was just one of those things. But the penalty was given. After that, we had to regroup and make sure we didn't concede.
"Obviously, the penalty happened. But we had to see the game out for the nine minutes of injury time. It was a very hard one to take.
“We have shot ourselves in the foot with the goals and the times of them, but there are also positives to take and we will look at them.
"We have to pick ourselves up and go and play Livi now because that's a massive game for us. Three points is massive on Wednesday.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel