Ross Laidlaw admits Ross County showed Rangers ‘too much respect’ as they suffered a 2-0 Premiership defeat in Dingwall.
First half goals from Kemar Roofe and James Tavernier were enough to earn a comfortable win for Michael Beale’s side as they maintained their momentum heading into the Champions League showdown with PSV Eindhoven this week.
Roofe outmuscled James Brown before converting from close range as he connected with a Borna Barisic corner, while Tavernier burst forward through the County half and beat Laidlaw with a wonderful effort that found the top corner of the net.
▶️ Tavernier’s incredible long range goal helped Rangers defeat Ross County 2-0 in Dingwall this afternoon ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/SoP3J9zuTc
— Sky Sports Scotland (@ScotlandSky) August 26, 2023
And the keeper reckons those moments summed up a frustrating afternoon for Malky Mackay’s side as they were once again left with nothing to show for their efforts from a fixture against one of the Old Firm.
Laidlaw said: “I think we probably showed Rangers too much respect.
“I know they had a tough game through the week, but we probably sat off them a bit.
READ MORE: Ross County 0 Rangers 2: Tavernier stunner powers team to victory
“In the second half the manager told us to go man for man, and high press them. It did work a bit more, we had a few chances, but Rangers deserved to win.
“There are positives for us to take from the second half performance.
“We were disappointed it was a set-piece for the first goal. Jimmy Brown was saying he was pulled back a wee bit for the first one.
“For the second one we were in possession and gave the ball away. I actually thought it was going over the bar but I looked round and it was in the net.
“When you come up against quality players, they can punish you in these moments.
“I thought we did well to stay in the game. When you go 2-0 down you can easily concede three or four.
“It has not hit the goal difference too badly. We just need to move on – as the manager says we need to get results against the teams around us. It’s a huge one away to Kilmarnock next week.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here