Motherwell boss Stuart Kettlewell has called for clarity on two key incidents in his side’s 4-2 defeat to Rangers.
Fashion Sakala’s crucial goal which put Rangers 2-1 up and Calum Slattery’s sending off for trying to fend off Cantwell with his arm were both put under the microscope after controversy at Fir Park.
The Sakala decision was marginal at best while Slattery appeared very unlucky to receive a booking for what looked an innocent tussle.
And Kettlewell will be looking for some explaination in the hours ahead over the decision making of referee Nick Walsh.
He said: “I need some clarity. The Sakala offside for the third goal which was a massive moment in the game.
“I’d also like clarity on Calum Slattery’s second yellow card. There’s contact but he’s trying to protect the ball and he’s not got awareness of the guy behind him and the contact’s made on Cantwell’s shoulder.
“That becomes really frustrating.
READ MORE: Michael Beale responds to Rangers protests as he defends Ross Wilson
“I’m not calling anybody out, I’m genuinely asking for clarity. But the third goal it looks to me that our player Dan Casey is the blue line which is behind the red line which is Sakala from the pictures I’ve seen.
“From what I’ve seen it looks like he’s offside. We never berated the referee or the fourth official, we’re not hammering the system in any way, but it’s a big goal at a big time.”
Officials aside, Kettlewell was delighted with what his side brought to what wasn an enthralling battle.
He said: “I thought we were really good at what we wanted to do in the game. In the first half we limited Rangers to virtually nothing. When you play against a team of that quality, you have to be happy with that first chunk of it.
“We scored a brilliant goal ourselves from something we’d identified but the second half opened up a bit and the game hinged on some big calls.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel