David Martindale does not believe that referee David Dickinson was correct to award Rangers a penalty kick early on at the Tony Macaroni Arena but the Livingston manager did concede that the decision was ‘debatable’.
Livi full-back James Penrice grabbed Alfredo Morelos’ shirt midway through the first half after Ayo Obileye had beat the Colombian to the ball and a spot-kick was awarded after Dickinson reviewed the incident with the help of VAR at the pitchside monitor.
James Tavernier cooly despatched the penalty for the visitors to hand them the lead before curling in an excellent free-kick 12 minutes from time to provide Michael Beale’s men with some breathing space. Substitute Kemar Roofe added a third with five minutes to go to seal the 3-0 win.
Speaking at his post-match press conference, Martindale said: “Who’s going to say it then? I don’t think it was a penalty. I think it’s very, very soft.
“I’m going to concede that he had his jersey but I don’t think he was pulling it. I don’t think there was any force in it. You didn’t see Morelos’ body shape changing with the momentum.
“I don’t think Morelos is anywhere near the ball, it’s not denying a goal scoring opportunity. So I think it is very harsh.
“I think if you were to go around every game in the Premiership – or even every game in Scotland – there would be 20 penalties given today for somebody holding the opposition player’s shirt.
“It happens to Joel Nouble every day of the week and we don’t seem to get fouls or free-kicks or penalty kicks for it. So I don’t think there is a lot in it.
“I can see why the referee has had to go and have a look at the monitor but I’m a wee bit disappointed because there has got to be some argument in terms of the momentum or the force that’s used to pull the shirt.
“But that’s just me, it’s obviously debatable. We could go around the room and some of you would think it’s a penalty and some of you would not. And anyone that says it is – you’re barred!”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel