WILL 2020, finally, bring the end of the two-club domination in Scottish women’s football? After a couple of seasons when they were genuinely challenged by Hibernian in SWPL1, Glasgow City are bearing down on an
inevitable 13th successive title, while Hibernian have won the last seven knock-out competitions.
Few would challenge the notion that the pair will also contest next month’s SSE Scottish Women’s Cup final at Tynecastle, although Rangers and Motherwell have the opportunity to prevent that happening today, at Forthbank, where both semi-finals are being played.
But, given that City have not lost
a league match since 2016, nor Hibernian a domestic cup tie since 2015, looking beyond this year is where it gets interesting. Emma Brownlie, the former Celtic and Hibs defender who joined Rangers from Everton last month, feels her new club’s decision to change the goalposts could upset the established order.
As of January, the entire Rangers first-team squad will be on semi-professional contracts. A side which has never won a major trophy hopes to challenge for all three very soon.
“Rangers are a huge club and the intent and ambition they have for women’s football is massive,” Brownlie confirmed. “We’re not so naïve to think we can throw a lot of money at it and win the league next season because it doesn’t just happen overnight, but investing brings you better players, which definitely helps.”
The second point is pertinent because there is no way Brownlie would have joined Rangers had they not announced their ambitious plans and offered her a paid contract. She won three Scottish Cups and three League Cups at Hibs and admitted: “They will always be a club close to my heart because of what they’ve done for me as a player. But in football there’s a point where you have to be selfish and progress your game.”
With players at some top clubs arguably already committing to the 18-20 hour week Rangers will contractually expect of their semi-pro squad next season, the key to a power shift will be winter recruitment.
While Celtic, to their cost, failed to land their top targets in the previous close season, Brownlie’s decision could signal the inevitable – that just as in men’s football, money will talk the loudest.
Glasgow City already have some players on professional contracts and will be able to offer Champions League football again next season. They may, in the short to medium term at least, survive any repercussions from the established Scottish clubs moving towards paid women’s teams.
“The fact is that Rangers will be offering players contracts, and Celtic will hopefully be doing it as well,” the Scotland midfielder Leanne Crichton said. “Glasgow City have professional players already and want to keep making positive moves forward. The more teams that bring a challenge to us will only make us better.”
Hibs may have bigger problems. Because the national performance academy is in Edinburgh, and because the club has been so successful in the cup competitions especially, they are an attractive option for the country’s best young players. Will that continue?
Stewart McGuire, the assistant head coach, says he is aware of what other clubs’ moves to paid football might mean for Hibs. Speaking at the Hampden press conference to promote the semi-finals he nevertheless said: “I don’t think we’ll be left behind. We are preparing for things in the background as well. We can’t go into too much detail at the moment because none of these things are written in stone as yet. We’re doing our own preparation and we’ll let our girls know as soon as possible what we’re planning.”
Motherwell will be trying to ease memories of last season’s 8-0 Scottish Cup final defeat against Hibs when they play the holders in today’s second semi-final. They have almost a new team and looking beyond this season, head coach Donald Jennow knows where the club stands.
“Right now we’re not in a position where we’re competing with Glasgow City, Hibs, Rangers and Celtic from a financial standpoint,” he pointed out. “They can do what’s right for their clubs.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here