Celtic chairman Peter Lawwell hit back at a journalist turned blogger over a "highly personal question" in a tense exchange at the club AGM.
The meeting was held at Celtic Park this morning with a section reserved for shareholders to ask questions to those at the top table.
One of those to step to the microphone was former Joe McHugh, a prominent Celtic blogger who previously worked for the Daily Mirror as a journalist.
The blogger questioned chiefs over the appointment of Mark Lawwell as head of recruitment citing "three disastrous transfer windows" and the departure of the "chairman's son".
Mark Lawwell - who helped bring Ange Postecoglou to Celtic - joined the club from the City Group. He served for two years before leaving "to pursue fresh challenges".
Suggesting Lawwell was "sacked", McHugh questioned the "jovial" nature of the appointment of Lawwell at the club's last AGM.
The blogger said: "Last year, you were quite jovial when asked about the appointment of Mark Lawwell as the head of recruitment.
"After three disastrous transfer windows, when did you first get concerned about the performance of the chairman's son? And at what point did you decide that you had to sack the chairman's son?"
Read more:
-
I will defend Mark Lawwell to the hilt and here's why - Rodgers
-
Peter Lawwell points to Rangers UCL shut out amid Celtic finance boon
Chairman Lawwell was quick to respond as he called out McHugh over the "highly personal question" and stated the blogger has an "unhealthy obsession" with him and his son.
He said: "Can I first come in. This is a highly personal question.
"Joe writes a blog and Joe has got an unhealthy obsession with me and my son, that's the background. So I'm not going to give this question any credibility by answering it.
"I will pass to Michael, if you keep that in mind, where Joe's coming from please."
Michael Nicholson and Brendan Rodgers then intervened to shut down the question and defend Lawwell.
Nicholson stated: "This is a meeting to discuss Celtic. It's not a meeting to discuss unwarranted personal attacks on any of our colleagues or former colleagues.
"Last year I wasn't jovial, I was very serious about the decision that we'd made to bring Mark to the club. Those decisions we stand by.
"The collective that we worked with over the last period of time is, as I say, a collective responsibility. When Mark decided to leave to pursue other opportunities, we were sorry to see him go.
"Brendan and I worked very closely with Mark. And as I say, that's not jovial, that's a statement of fact. So fair enough."
Celtic manager Brendan Rodgers then defended Lawwell adding: "Can I just come in on that... Mark done a fantastic job here at Celtic. Every player that comes into here will not succeed.
"I think if you look at Mark's influence on bringing in Ange Postecoglou was huge. If that was his only contribution to here, then he did a fantastic job. But he didn't. He was influenced from bringing in other players, like Ali Johnson and some of these other guys.
"All the players won't work out that come in here, and I know that as a manager and as a coach.
"My experience of working with Mark was second to none. He decided to go down a different route, and I respect that. But I also sit here and he's defence because he's a massive Celtic supporter. Like Peter, from a Celtic family, who want nothing but the best for Celtic.
"Sometimes in that role as recruitment, like it is as a manager, you bring in a player, and it just might not quite work out for whatever reason. But finally, what I do know is that his intention was for the very, very best for Celtic. And for that, that's why I will defend him."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel