Former Celtic manager Martin O Neill has outlined his position on the Green Brigade's disruption of the minute's silence at Rugby Park last Sunday.
The legendary former boss also backed Irish winger James McLean, who protests all such displays in England by standing apart from his teammates.
O'Neill has taken a nuanced stance on the situation, pointing out that Celtic fans should have remained silent rather than singing throughout - but explaining why the roots of their actions can be explained by history.
Asked if the fans should have remained quiet, he told TALKsport: "Yes, they should. If it's a minute's silence, it's a minute's silence.
He added: "You should have respect for the moment… yes, just being silent. And I would go with that. But in terms of the wearing of the poppy, in terms of all of those particular things during it, there is that historical point.
“Derek McInnes might have a point because I think there is an idea of having respect for a moment, and because it’s Kilmarnock’s home game.
“But this is historical. We've gone through this here before.. for a lot of Irish republicans and nationalists, the poppy does represent a bit of oppression.
“Way back, just after the First World War; in terms of the British Army; a group called the Black and Tans coming in and just running amok - these type of things have happened.
Read more:
“And so that is historical, and that has had an effect.
“Young James McClean has taken a stance there, because of where he lives, and where he was brought up, and that's completely understandable.
“James took the stance some years ago, realising that he was putting his career in jeopardy in the sense that he not only was going to be booed by away fans, but he was going to be booed by his home fans at Sunderland.
“And he went from, you know, from being a hero, where he did brilliantly, absolutely brilliantly, in his first season there to being booed at home. That's very, very difficult to take, but he took that stance.
“I commend James for it. He's a brave lad. He's not only brave on the pitch, he's brave off the pitch as well.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel