Manchester United have confirmed that Ruud van Nistelrooy has departed the club after serving as interim manager in recent weeks.
The Dutchman stepped into the role temporarily following the dismissal of Erik ten Hag on October 28.
Van Nistelrooy, who returned to Old Trafford as an assistant coach in July under a two-year contract, achieved three wins and one draw in his four matches as caretaker boss, with the team scoring 11 goals during that period and keeping two clean sheets.
Despite these positive results, incoming manager Ruben Amorim, who is still waiting for a visa before he can officially begin coaching, has opted not to retain Van Nistelrooy's services.
The 48-year-old is a former Netherlands international striker and enjoyed a successful five-season playing career at Manchester United in the early 2000's.
He was previously head coach at PSV Eindhoven after being appointed in March 2022, and went on to win the Johan Cruyff Shield and the 2022-23 KNVB Cup before sensationally resigning, citing "a lack of support".
Read more:
- Ben Doak 'really enjoying' football as he reflects on loan experience
- Green Brigade release Celtic protest statement on ‘hypocrisy & shame’
A club statement on Monday afternoon read: "Manchester United can confirm that Ruud van Nistelrooy has left the club. Ruud rejoined in the summer and has taken charge of the team for the past four matches as interim head coach.
"We are grateful for his contribution and the way in which he has approached his role throughout his time with the club. He will always be very welcome at Old Trafford.
"Rene Hake, Jelle ten Rouwelaar and Pieter Morel have also departed and we wish them all well for the future.
"We will confirm the full men’s first team coaching composition in due course."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here