McLaren have asked for a “right of review” over Lando Norris’ controversial penalty at the United States Grand Prix as George Russell and Lewis Hamilton urged Formula One to introduce full-time stewards.
Norris was handed a five-second penalty for overtaking Max Verstappen during the closing stages in Austin last weekend, despite both drivers leaving the track and McLaren arguing that the Dutchman had forced his title rival wide.
It meant Verstappen finished ahead of Norris and extended his title lead to 57 points.
A hearing will take place in Mexico on Friday following McLaren’s request which will determine whether there is “significant and relevant” new evidence which was unavailable to the stewards at the time of their decision.
McLaren said in a statement: “We believe there is a significant and new element that was unavailable to us at the time the decision was made.”
George Russell believes the sport should have full-time stewards (David Davies/PA)
Formula One has a different stewarding panel at each race and it is not a full-time, professional role.
Speaking ahead of this weekend’s Mexican Grand Prix, Russell – who is a director of the Grand Prix Drivers’ Association – said he believes that needs to change and that F1 should follow the lead of other global sports.
“The stewards are doing the best job that they can. They have a set of guidelines that they follow,” the Mercedes driver said.
“The only way you are going to have consistency is if you have the same stewards at every single race weekend.
“They are very experienced but they here as almost volunteers. It is not a professional, paid job. If you look at football for example, even though there is controversy, they are professionals.
A big moment in the race and potentially the season 😮
Norris overtakes Verstappen but picks up a 5-second penalty for passing off track ✋#F1 #USGP pic.twitter.com/y1DFXGde0U
— Formula 1 (@F1) October 20, 2024
“As a sport, that’s probably the direction that we should be heading.”
Russell believes Verstappen should also have been penalised but said that the Dutchman is finding a “loophole” and would not have done the same thing if it were not against his title rival.
“I think Max should have also got a penalty for running off the track,” Russell added.
“You can argue Max’s driving is not against the regulations, he is just finding a loophole.
“He is in a title battle with Lando, the same way he was in a title battle with Lewis (in 2021). I don’t think he would have done the same manoeuvre if that was any other driver.
“In the same way that in Brazil 2021, he would not have done the same manoeuvre if it was any other driver.
Hamilton shared Russell’s view on full-time stewards (David Davies/PA)
“So it is a bit do or die and I think he is quite happy to drive in that manner against his title rival. Which I totally understand.”
Seven-time world champion Hamilton has had a number of wheel-to-wheel tussles with Verstappen and echoed Russell’s view on the move to full-time stewards.
“There has always been a grey area, that is why he (Verstappen) has got away with it for so long,” Hamilton said.
“As a sport, we need to level up in all areas. You look at other global sports, they have full-time refs for example and I am sure that would not be a bad thing for our sport.
“I experienced it many times with Max, you should not be able to launch the car up the inside and go off and still hold your position.”
Verstappen also made a bold move up the inside into turn one in Austin as pole-sitter Norris slipped to fourth.
The three-time world champion is confident his moves meet the regulations and laughed off the suggestion that he was not concerned about making the corner in his battle with Norris.
“It is quite impressive that people can read my mind,” Verstappen said. “It is crazy, I always try to make the corner. I don’t try to look for shortcuts.
“I think everyone should speak for themselves. Don’t bother too much about other people and just enjoy your life.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here