HAMILTON manager John Rankin has welcomed ambitious SFA plans to create “cooperation clubs” in Scottish football – but argued that expanding the Championship to 16 teams could increase the number of promising youngsters who make a successful step up into the senior game.
A working party comprising members of the SFA professional game board and the SPFL competitions working group is currently assessing the key recommendations contained in the Transition Phase paper that was published back by the governing body back in May.
Co-authors Andy Gould, the SFA chief football officer, and Chris Docherty, the head of elite men’s strategy, would like to see a move towards a system which has helped youth players force their way into the first team at top flight clubs in countries such as Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Hungary and Serbia.
They believe that Premiership and Championship clubs should be able to sign agreements with clubs lower down the pyramid system which would see between three and five of their players – who must be eligible to play for Scotland and be under a certain age - to move freely between them outside of the transfer windows.
Read more:
- Portugal manager admits concern for Cristiano Ronaldo at Hampden
- How taking youth development into the boardroom made Danes great again
- St Mirren shock showed Scotland must follow Norway and put youth first
Gould and Docherty feel it would allow talented prospects who are only at their clubs to provide injury cover for established first team players or to satisfy UEFA locally trained player quotas in the Champions league, Europa League and Conference League to get regular and invaluable game time at a critical stage in their development.
Former Ross County, Inverness Caledonian Thistle, Hibernian, Dundee United, Falkirk, Queen of the South and Clyde midfielder Rankin acknowledged the scheme would, if approved by the 42 SPFL member clubs, be hugely beneficial to Scotland’s best kids.
However, the ex-PFA Scotland chairman, who led Hamilton back into the Championship via the end-of-season play-offs back in May, reckons having 12 teams in the Premiership and 10 teams in the Championship, League 1 and League 2 currently makes it difficult for managers to take chances on kids.
He accepts there is no prospect of the top flight being increased in size – but he thinks that expanding the second tier might enable more youngsters to get on the park and savour a taste of competitive action.
“I understand the logic behind the changes which are being put forward,” he said. “ It will help top young talents to get game time. So I can see the argument behind what they are proposing.
“But in the Championship in the past couple of seasons it has been really, really competitive. On the last day in the last couple of seasons you had teams playing to win the title, like when Dundee played Queen’s Park last year, and teams playing to avoid relegation.
“A couple of seasons ago, there were six teams which could qualify for the play-offs, three teams which could win the league and three teams which could go down. Basically, every team bar one had something to play for on the last day of the season.
“It is the same the further down the leagues you go. In League 1 last season on the last day of the season there were three teams which could go down. It is tough for a manager to take a chance on young kids in that environment, when so much is riding on every result.
“If you went with a bigger league then it might not be as competitive, but we could probably bleed more youngsters into it because there is not as much of a threat to the club by playing them. Therefore they get an opportunity. There is no way we can play a team of 16 or 17-year-olds just now.”
Read more:
- FIFA urged to act as Celtic and Rangers go from 'hunters to hunted'
- English clubs' Brexit brawn drain putting Scotland's academies at risk
- Clubs must shelve self-interest and put Scottish football first
Rankin added: “You can’t change the number of teams in the Premiership, that is not an option. But could we make the Championship a 16 team league?
“It is a very good, competitive league with good players in it at the moment. But we could get more youngsters into it if we increased the number of teams. That would be a double-edged sword because you are taking away some of the competitiveness.
“But there are players coming through who could make the grade if they got a chance. There is a lot of talent there, of course there is. Is it a risk to play kids? It depends on the environment they are going into.”
Rankin took up a position as a youth coach at Hearts when he retired from playing and worked with the best youngsters coming through the ranks at Tynecastle – including current Brentford defender and Scotland internationalist Aaron Hickey.
He feels that one of the reasons more kids don’t make a successful transition from age-group sides to the first team is because many of them are not of a sufficient standard.
“I think we have got too many players in our academies,” he said. “Every age group from under-nines to under-16s has basically got 16 players. Can we guarantee that each club is going to bring through 16 players at each age? There is no chance. The numbers don’t add up.
“Everyone has got a chance. But there are so many factors in Scotland which stop players fulfilling their talent. I have got a really strong opinion on football and youth development and the way things are going within that. I don’t think it is anything to do with the SFA, it is more of a culture thing in Scotland. But that is maybe for another day.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel