The Paris Olympics has created new household names but has also seen the final hurrah for a number of stars.
Some left with medals around their necks while for others the experience was bittersweet.
Here, the PA news agency looks at the big names bowing out.
Andy Murray
One of Britain’s all-time sporting greats, Murray had an emotional farewell at Wimbledon last month but chose the Olympics for his final event. The two-time singles gold medallist could not add more silverware in men’s doubles with Dan Evans but the pair won two dramatic matches to reach the quarter-finals.
Max Whitlock
Britain’s most successful Olympic gymnast came back for one final tilt on his signature pommel horse. Whitlock won gold in Rio and Tokyo on the apparatus, and six medals in total across three Games, but he was disappointed to finish fourth this time.
Helen Glover
Glover won rowing gold in London and Rio in dominant fashion with Heather Stanning in the women’s pair before taking several years out of the sport and having three children. She just missed out on a medal in Tokyo but finished with silver in the women’s four having been one of Britain’s flag bearers at the opening ceremony.
Carl Hester
At the age of 57, dressage rider Hester all but confirmed his Olympic career is over. A Games that began with the shock revelations about his protege Charlottle Dujardin ended with Hester winning a medal at a fourth successive Olympics with bronze in the team competition.
Lizzie Deignan
Cyclist Deignan was the first British athlete to win a medal on home soil at London 2012 with silver in the women’s road race. The 35-year-old mother of two, a former world champion on the road and the track, competed in her fourth Games in Paris, finishing 12th in the road race.
Rafael Nadal
While Murray was unequivocal that Paris would be his career swansong, 38-year-old Nadal has kept things open for now, but he will certainly not be in Los Angeles. The Spaniard, who won gold in singles in 2008 and doubles in 2016, teamed up with Carlos Alcaraz in the men’s doubles here but they bowed out in the quarter-finals.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here