David Gray criticised Hibernian's 3-0 defeat to St Mirren, calling it “unacceptable” after their season opener in Paisley turned into a disaster.
The Easter Road team drew a crowd of over 1,500 away supporters for their first Scottish Premiership match of the 2024/25 campaign, but they fell behind early in the second half when Roland Idowu found the back of the net with a precise shot into the far corner.
Shortly after the goal, the VAR system went down, leading to a temporary halt in play before it resumed in a limited capacity.
Nevertheless, the outcome was unaffected, as Oisin Smyth scored a header in the 77th minute and added a second goal just two minutes later, both assisted by fellow substitute James Scott.
The Hibs head coach conceded the overall result isn't good enough and went on to rue the manner his side allowed St Mirren to cruise in front - and ultimately leave them heading back to the Scottish capital pointless.
Gray said: “It was certainly a game of two halves but as soon as you see the result, the performance becomes irrelevant because to lose 3-0 is unacceptable for us.
“We created enough chances to be in front so there is enough positives to take from that, the fact that we created chances is great and we limited them to very little.
Read more:
- Jim Goodwin wants SFA action as Dundee United boss pelted by missiles
- Positive player & fan connection crucial for Aberdeen to be successful
“And to concede straight after half-time, the goal was very avoidable, and the second goal is a genuine mistake (a misplaced pass) which of course happens in games.
“To lose the third goal in the manner we did was so avoidable. From the top end of the pitch there was three or four things we could have done to affect that better.
“I say it all the time, don’t let one mistake become two mistakes because three mistakes usually results in a goal.
“So we just can’t accept, especially the third goal, because at that point the game is gone.
“We huffed and puffed at times and had a few half-chances but the damage had been done at that point.
“Overall, they were more clinical and defended the box better than we did and that’s why the result was 3-0.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here