The BBC must be guaranteed a greater level of live Olympics coverage in order to “capture the imagination of future Olympians”.
Dame Caroline Dinenage, who announced on Tuesday her intention to stand again as chair of the Culture, Media and Sport (CMS) select committee, said she understood viewers’ frustrations around the corporation’s limited coverage.
The BBC can only show two simultaneous live streams under the current broadcasting deal with the International Olympic Committee (IOC), with Warner Bros Discovery the primary rights holder.
While the BBC did manage to capture a flurry of medals in diving, triathlon and rowing across its two live streams on Wednesday morning, Dinenage hopes this issue will be addressed by the Government.
“I understand the frustration, it does feel like in these huge sporting moments, with breathtaking and iconic performances around every corner, the coverage is not broad enough,” Dinenage told the PA news agency.
“If we want to capture the imagination of our future Olympians we need higher minimum levels for our national broadcasters.”
Read more:
- Andy Murray & Dan Evans produce stunning Olympics comeback
- Eilish McColgan wants to make Scotland proud after learning Olympics fate
The BBC announced in January that every Games up to and including the Brisbane event in 2032 would be available on free to air, under the same restrictions as have existed since the last summer Games in Tokyo three years ago.
The Media Act 2024 has modernised the listed events regime, which means that the regime will now protect live coverage on public service broadcasters’ internet-based streaming services.
The Act has also added the requirement that Ofcom be satisfied that there is ‘adequate live’ coverage on PSBs of multisport events like the Olympics.
As part of implementation, Ofcom is required to define ‘adequate live coverage’, and they have recently launched a call for evidence on this issue. Interested parties have been encouraged to submit their responses.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here