Saudi Arabia's leaders for the 2034 World Cup bid have promised a competition environment that will be free from discrimination.
As the sole bidder for the tournament, the Kingdom submitted its bid book to FIFA earlier this week, which publicly released on Wednesday evening.
The proposal includes plans for 15 stadiums across five cities, including the innovative NEOM city, but does not specify the tournament's timing in 2034.
Due to extreme summer temperatures, a winter schedule may be necessary, requiring cooperation with local leagues for a mid-season break.
Concerns about Saudi Arabia's human rights record, particularly regarding migrant workers and the LGBTQ+ community, are central to the scrutiny of the bid.
A human rights strategy document states: “We are committed to cultivating a competition environment free of discriminatory practices, and striving to eradicate discrimination based on race, ethnicity, gender, disability, or any other protected characteristic.”
Saudi Arabia's crown prince added: "We look forward to hosting an exceptional and unprecedented edition of the FIFA World Cup by harnessing our strengths and capabilities to bring joy to football fans around the world."
They also claim the tournament would be the largest held within one single country’s boundaries.
Read more:
- Neil Lennon receives Rapid Bucharest backing after 'attacks without evidence'
- Stephen Robinson urges sold out St Mirren crowd to embrace Euro tie with Valur
The bid book for the 2030 World Cup was also released, which will mainly take place in Spain, Portugal, and Morocco, starting with three matches in South America before moving to Europe and North Africa.
If hosting requirements are met, both the 2030 and 2034 bids are expected to be approved at a virtual FIFA Congress on December 11.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel