Chris Billam-Smith believes his experience was the difference maker after he defended his WBO cruiserweight world title with a unanimous decision victory over Richard Riakporhe.
CBS executed trainer Shane McGuigan’s plan at Selhurst Park as he managed to win his rematch with Riakporhe, five-years after his 2019 split decision defeat to the Midnight Train.
The Bournemouth fighter impressed from the first bell to secure a 116-111, 115-112, 115-112 ruling on a night where he took advantage of Riakporhe’s forgettable display.
“The difference between my fight with Richard five-years ago is experience,” Billam-Smith said.
“He won the first fight because of experience and I won this fight because of experience.
“Those experiences you can’t buy or fake it, you have to go through it. The ups and downs, the tough fights, they are everything.”
Billam-Smith, who defeated clinch-heavy Lawrence Okolie to pick up the WBO belt last May, battled with a similar approach from Riakporhe for much of the fight.
The Gentleman admitted he felt the similarities between Riakporhe’s display and Okolie’s.
Riakporhe also picked up a 12th round point deduction for punches to the back of the head.
He added: “I said that it was similar to the Lawrence fight and it felt like that in terms of him being the power puncher.
“In the first fight with Richard he held a lot, I knew he would hold a lot. He was getting my left arm under his right arm because he knows I’m good with my left hand.
“It was difficult to get clean shots off and no one likes to let me work on the inside as it’s not the right thing to do so a lot of people hold. The head was coming in as well but you have to do what you have to do in there.
“I expected it, to be honest.”
The win marked CBS’s second title defence after December’s victory over Mateusz Masternak.
McGuigan wants his fighter to be in the mix for a potential unification fight.
He said: “We have to go for a unified world title, I would love it. We want to box (Jai) Opetaia early next summer, that’s the dream fight and we want to do that for undisputed.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here