Hampden is a stadium that the nation should be proud of, says Mike Mulraney, as the Scottish FA president revealed it would cost £250m to bring the ends behind the goals closer to the pitch.
The national stadium has come in for criticism ever since its redevelopment in the 1990s, with the road links and infrastructure around the ground and sight lines from the East and West stands just two areas that have caused concern among supporters.
Hampden’s critics contend that the old bowl shape leaves fans too far away from the action, but Mulraney rubbished claims that the atmosphere is affected as a result, and said it would be unrealistic to copy the sort of refurbishment that has been carried out by Stuttgart, for example, who brought the ends of their stadium in closer to the playing field in 2011.
The architect behind that project, Eberhard Becker, told Herald Sport back in 2018 that it would cost around £90m to carry out such a refurbishment at Hampden, and he invited representatives from the Scottish FA to get in touch with him to discuss the feasibility of carrying out a similar project in Mount Florida.
READ MORE: Stuttgart-style Hampden refurb could cost up to £90m, warns architect behind project
But now, Mulraney – who made his personal fortune in construction – estimates those costs to have skyrocketed to around £250m.
With little to no prospect of such funding levels ever being available, the SFA president wants to concentrate on funding access to facilities at grassroots level, and more realistic improvements that can be made to the national stadium. While also steadfastly believing that Hampden is nowhere near as bad as its critics would have you believe.
“It would take £250million to do it here,” Mulraney said.
“If someone wants to give me it, if the media want to run a campaign and do a fundraiser, I’m your man.
“But in the meantime, I want five-year-old Jimmys and eight-year-old Jennys out on pitches playing football, I want older people to do walking football, I want the people who have been deprived of an opportunity to get one. If we do not have pitches we cannot build our game.
“All the people who say: ‘Build the women’s game’ You can’t build the women’s game if the pitches are full of boys. Are you going to take a boy off it to put a girl on?
“I love my national stadium, it’s great when we win. I couldn’t care if I was sitting on an upturned Irn Bru crate if I’m watching Scotland win. But I don’t want to be.
“I want to be in a National Stadium I am currently proud of and one that, when it’s finished, we’ll be prouder of because we’ll improve it as well.”
Mulraney announced a commitment to invest a record £50m in facilities over the next five years after the SFA AGM was held last week, but those funds will be ringfenced, with none of that money going towards improvements at Hampden.
Mulraney was keen to stress though that while his main priority is improving access to grassroots facilities, he will also be channelling his energy towards making Hampden as good as it can possibly be with the funds that are available to the game’s governing body.
“100 per cent,” he said.
“I have a dual task, I have also got to look at how we improve Hampden. Now, all those who say Hampden is not very good, it tends to be in the old days when we had 10,000 there and we got beat 1-0.
“Tell me, when I have 51,000 folk bouncing and the lights flashing and we have just qualified, who thinks it’s rubbish? Because I don’t. I think it’s bloody brilliant.”
The bashing of Hampden is, Mulraney believes, symptomatic of a negativity throughout Scottish society at large, and that the stadium actually compares well to more recently renovated arenas such as Wembley.
He is hoping though that he can raise additional funds that can go towards improving the stadium further, while being realistic about what can be achieved.
“I have just been down to Wembley, and the fans are quite far away from the goals, believe it or not,” he said.
READ MORE: Mulraney slams ignorant SFA blazer critics after pay rise
“Nobody speaks about it. I go around Europe and see it over and over again. What do Scots do? We kick ourselves. If we could kick ourselves with both feet we would.
“Well, guess what? I don’t, I’m proud of our national stadium.
“But we will be out there, and I am out there, and we are looking at how we get different income to improve our national stadium.
“Of course it needs improved. I’m a property guy, I think most people know that. You can’t sit on your asset, you need to sweat it, invest in it, and improve it.
“That will not be included in the £50million [facilities pledge], anything that goes on that will be on top.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel