Lewis Hamilton fears Formula One cars from 2026 will remain “pretty slow” after the next-generation machinery was unveiled.
On the eve of this weekend’s Canadian Grand Prix, F1 provided a glimpse into its future after the concept of a car – which is hoped will provide greater racing from 2026 onwards – was revealed.
The new smaller machinery, incorporating a simplified combustion engine using fully sustainable fuels and the introduction of a new overtaking boost button, is set to be 30 kilograms lighter than the sport’s current design.
The FIA has now promised a minimum weight of 768kg – down from almost 800kg – with the governing body saying a “nimble” car has been at the heart of its new concept.
READ MORE: Scotland manager on the prospect of Scott McTominay facing Germany
Hamilton has repeatedly stressed that the current cars are too heavy while Lando Norris said last year that the machinery “needs to be made lighter again and then the cars will come back alive”.
Seven-time world champion Hamilton was driving cars around 600kg when he started in F1 in 2007 and believes that the small weight reduction for 2026 will not have a massive impact.
“It is only 30kg so while it is a step in the right direction they are still heavy,” Hamilton, who will be driving for Ferrari in 2026, said.
“I’ve only seen what everyone has seen this morning but I’ve spoken to some drivers who have driven it (the 2026 car) on the simulators and they say it is pretty slow.
“The sustainability of the new cars, though, is a bold step and that is going in the right direction.”
READ MORE: Where Scotland must improve in final Euro 2024 rehearsal
Recent big regulation changes in the sport have led to a large spread in the field and a period of dominance for one team.
Mercedes began a period of success when the change to V6 engines came in in 2014 while Red Bull’s current spell of dominance following the regulation change in 2022 has led to accusations that the sport has been boring.
Teams such as Ferrari and McLaren are beginning to catch up with Red Bull, prompting the question as to whether a longer period of stable regulations would be better for the sport.
“More often that not when they (the FIA) do the changes some teams do better that others,” Mercedes’ Hamilton said.
“Hopefully these regulations won’t make too big a difference.”
READ MORE: Mulraney slams ignorant SFA blazer critics after pay rise
McLaren’s Norris and Oscar Piastri echoed fears that the field may spread out again with a regulation change.
“Just when it gets exciting there is going to be another change,” Norris said. “There are reasons for it and you want to make the sport better.
“But just as the sport gets exciting again I don’t want it to go the opposite way. A regulation change could mean you have massive gaps and people will go ‘it’s just boring again’.
“Now is as exciting as it has been in a long time and I want to leave it like this for a few years and that’s the best for people watching on TV.”
READ MORE: Murrayfield to host Glasgow URC final after Taylor Swift & Celtic chat
Australian Piastri added: “Every time the regulations have changed it has led to a pretty big spread.
“With these regs we are only just starting to catch up to Red Bull now.
“But we have a place in society to be at the forefront of technology and innovation and I guess you could argue that sometimes that comes at the cost of the racing.
“I wouldn’t be surprised if the teams separated more in 2026 with the aero regs and the engine regs.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here