Two-time US Open winner Andy North believes “contract killer” Brooks Koepka will be the man to beat as he defends his US PGA Championship title.
Koepka’s victory at Oak Hill last year made him the first LIV Golf player to win a major after joining the Saudi-funded breakaway and means he has won more majors (five) than regular PGA Tour events (four).
The former world number one has also won three of the last six US PGA’s – and finished second in another – and heads to Valhalla on the back of his record fourth LIV victory in Singapore.
![Brooks Koepka](http://content.assets.pressassociation.io/AP/2024/05/05/bd10bb5068db48f9bed2bf57ecea1d9f.jpg?w=640)
“I think, and I’ve actually said, he’s a contract killer, simply,” ESPN analyst North said on a conference call to promote the year’s second major.
“He shows up at a major championship, opens his locker and there’s like the ‘Mission Impossible’ thing. Here’s your assignment, go kill somebody this week. That’s how he approaches golf at major championships. I love it.
“I don’t think he probably learned anything from the disappointment at Augusta (a tie for 45th in April’s Masters).
“I think he knows who he is. He knows what he can do at majors. I think he believes he can win every single major he tees it up in.
Brooks Koepka talking about why majors are the easiest to win a few years ago was so good.
You figure at least 80 of them I’m just going to beat. The other half of them won’t play well. From 35, some of them, pressure is going to get to them.”
Does he win his 6th major next… pic.twitter.com/HYf6MmRwR1
— Tour Pro 🏌️♂️ (@OfficialTourPro) May 11, 2024
“I sure as heck don’t want to bet against him. It looks like he’s figured out something on the greens. He won a week ago. I think he’s going to be tough to beat this next week.
“He’s a completely different player four weeks a year than he is the other 48 weeks a year and I love that about him.
“I think the fact that he can raise his game at majors where most people’s games go the other way, that’s really a huge testament to him and his mental makeup and how he just determines that he’s going to beat everybody once he shows up at a major.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here