Naomi Mannes defeated Hannah Rankin in a controversial split decision to get her hands on the WBA super-welterweight continental title in Liverpool.
With Rankin having lost her most recent bout – a world title fight against Ema Kozin last November – the Scot was under no illusions as to how important it was for her to get back to winning ways against Mannes.
Rankin went into this fight with considerably more experience than Mannes, who was making only her tenth professional appearance, but the German was in no way intimidated by the 33-year-old Scot in the early rounds, with the fight beginning at a frantic pace and both fighters attempting to go on the attack whenever possible.
The opening two rounds of the headline bout were evenly matched, although Rankin’s aggression tended to leave her open to an occasional counter attack from Mannes.
Towards the end of the third round and into the fourth round, however, Mannes began to tire, with the German’s pace dropping while Rankin’s experience and physical conditioning began to shine through and she caught Mannes with several clean shots.
The closing rounds of the eight-round fight were evenly matched, and although Rankin continued to be the more aggressive fighter of the two, Mannes was able to handle everything the Scot was throwing at her leaving the result very much in question as the final bell rang.
In what was the second consecutive loss for Rankin in what could be considered a dubious decision by the judges, Mannes was awarded the win by split decision to hand Rankin her eighth professional loss of her career.
The judges scorecards read 77-76 to Rankin and 77-75 and 79-74 to Mannes.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here