Mind the gap - then go out and widen it
And suddenly, there’s a gap.
Saints have made a habit of picking up big wins at Easter Road in recent years, very often with goals clinching the points right in front of the away end – who can forget Steven Maclean running into the stand behind the crowd going wild, Joe Shaughnessy bulleting in a late header or even Paddy Cregg’s sensational goal off the back of one of the best bits of one-touch football I’ve ever seen Saints play into that same net.
And so it was on Saturday. We rode our luck with the Hibs penalty shout in the first half and Dimitar Mitov pulled off yet more heroics – but Adama Sidibeh showed incredible composure to open the scoring early in the second half, while we exploited some serious weakness at defending set-pieces for Tony Gallagher’s winner.
Combined with Ross County’s result we’ve now got a small but important cushion over the Staggies. Four points ahead with six games to play – and at the weekend Rangers are the visitors to Dingwall. Given the stage of the season and the tightness of the title race, anything but a win for the Glasgow side would be unthinkable – or at least so we might hope given our current predicament.
All of that means Kilmarnock’s trip to McDiarmid Park on Saturday could be hugely significant in how the rest of our season plays out. We all want drama and excitement in our football – but I think we’d all love the prospect of the pressure coming off of our league status as soon as possible and the chance to start planning ahead now for another Premiership season.
A win would potentially put us seven points clear with five post-split matches to play. That’s a very healthy margin and one that even a draw in the head-to-head with County after matchday 33 would surely render insurmountable barring a miraculous set of results for the Highland club in their other four games.
Never say never – but a win against Killie puts us a giant step closer to safety, and you’d certainly hope we’d have enough to at least stumble over the line with an advantage of that size so close to the end of the season.
So putting our rose-tinted glasses on, what do we want to see for the remainder of the season if – and it remains a sizeable if - and when we do make ourselves safe?
For me, the rebuild needs to start as soon as possible. Anyone that isn’t in the plans for the 2024/25 season no longer gets game time. Guys like Fran Franczak – who looked so promising in his early appearances but who has been injured then benched ever since – get minutes. For Franczak in particular I think that is critical – does he stay here next season and try to make an impact aged just 16, or do we get him out on loan for six to 12 months? Let's get him on the pitch as much as possible in a blue shirt this season and see where he is.
It would also be a good opportunity to at least try to be a bit more forward thinking – change the system, try and be a bit more dynamic in possession, take more risks when the pressure isn’t on.
This is all obviously contingent on things going well over the next two or three weeks. We have an extremely tough game against a team with an excellent coach who do many things very, very well. They have attacking talent that I would love to see at Saints – the likes of Matty Kennedy who was brilliant during his stint in Perth – and a robust defence.
Then we come into the post-split fixtures – with a mish-mash of games against the likes of Ross County scrapping for their lives and the rest likely in a relative dead-rubber scenario, with Livingston basically already down and the rest with nothing to play for but pride.
Keep the head and safety can be assured sooner rather than later. A nice calm end to the season would be ideal and give us the platform to do so much better next season. We’ve been used over the last 15 years to stability and continuity. That isn’t really an option this summer. There needs to be a fairly healthy turnover of players and more of an identity to the team starting next season. Another disastrous League Cup group stage can’t happen.
Things can look upwards for next season – but that process has to start now.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel