The big calls from Rangers' 3-3 draw with Celtic have been assessed by a refereeing expert.
Dermot Gallagher, a former official in the Premier League, has analysed all of the major incidents from yesterday's pulsating game.
Speaking on Sky Sports' Ref Watch this morning, he went through each instance one by one alongside his fellow panelists, including Stephen Warnock and Sue Smith.
Celtic penalty - Connor Goldson handball
Gallagher said: "It's a good intervention. The referee can't see it on the field. You see here, he lifts his arm up and puts it towards the ball. There's no doubt in my mind.
"John Beaton goes to the screen, sees it, comes back, and simulates exactly what he did by showing that it taps him on the elbow."
⚽️ Dermot Gallagher assesses the big Old Firm incidents on Ref Watch and believes referee John Beaton got them all right 🔽 pic.twitter.com/wITDqymPRM
— Sky Sports Scotland (@ScotlandSky) April 8, 2024
Warnock added: "He's thinking he's going to have someone coming in the challenge him, so he's trying to protect himself. It's similar to the Dan Burn one before - when you jump, you don't jump with your arms by your side, you always jump with a physical aspect, thinking there's going to be contact from somewhere. Listen, though, he's made an error and he's been caught."
Smith: "I wonder is he trying to keep his arm tucked in? I think because of the position his arm was in, it was always going to be given. Sometimes defenders are defending differently now in terms of their arm positions because they're worried about things being given."
Foul - Alistair Johnston on Fabio Silva
Gallagher: "This was a really, really interesting situation because has he been punched in the face? I think Alistair Johnston has put his hands up to block him off. He knows there's going to be a collision, he raises his arms, almost to brace himself, but he certainly doesn't commit an act of violent conduct."
Rangers penalty - Johnston on Silva
Gallagher: "This is a very interesting clip. He [Silva] gets a yellow card for simulation, but when you see it again, obviously the angle you see Alistair Johnston lifts his leg, catches him on the knee and it's a penalty.
"So, the referee then has an even bigger dilemma because of the pressure he's put under. He goes to the screen, he comes back, the yellow for simulation is overturned, he gives a penalty but then it ramps up because the Rangers players are saying 'Johnston has already had a yellow card, he should get a second one'.
"For me, it's a foul. It's not a second yellow card, so it's not a red. He goes to the screen and he's got all options, so he can yellow card him, but I don't think it's a yellow card challenge. I think it's a foul."
READ MORE: What was said in heated Rangers vs Celtic exchange
Warnock: "I think it's a good decision. That's where we want VAR to step in."
Smith: "Yeah, completely agree. Initially, you can see why the referee thinks he's gone down too easily, but then you can clearly see when he goes over to the screen, you can see the connection and that it's a 100 percent penalty."
Gallagher came back in: "The only thing there is you've got a complete pendulum swing. You've gone from the referee giving no foul and a yellow card for simulation to going the other way, it's a penalty.
"If he'd then gone penalty, second yellow, red card, that would be such a massive swing. You can imagine the swing if he did."
Disallowed Rangers goal - Foul in APP (Attacking Phase of Play)
Gallagher said: "Well, they travel a long way. They (Celtic) have a lot of time to re-set. I know they don't get the ball back, but the referee goes to the screen and gives a foul. I don't think there's any doubt it's a foul, but it's whether the foul is in the immediate build-up. Is that foul in the attacking phase? VAR felt it was, sends John Beaton to the screen for the third time in the match. I don't think we'll argue it's a foul, but is it re-refereeing?"
Warnock: "That's the problem, the re-refereeing of the game, I think that's the hard bit to understand."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel