Celtic have learned the outcome of their appeal over Yang's red card against Hearts.
The Parkhead club has lost their appeal, meaning the winger will now serve a two-game suspension.
The 21-year-old was initially booked by referee Don Robertson after he was punished for a high boot challenge involving defender Alex Cochrane.
VAR reviewed the incident though, with John Beaton advising his colleague to check the flashpoint at the pitchside monitor for a potential red card.
After consulting with VAR, and looking at the incident again, Robertson upgraded his decision from yellow to red, and Yang was sent off in the early stages of the game.
Now, the SFA has confirmed on its website that Celtic's appeal against the decision of serious foul play has been dismissed.
The tribunal was heard today on Tuesday, March 5. The decision means the original sanction is re-imposed with immediate effect. The £500 fee is forfeited and is to be paid within 30 days.
A club spokesperson said: “We have received notification that the club's claim has been dismissed.
“Clearly we are surprised and extremely disappointed at this decision.”
Meanwhile, the treatment by Celtic fans towards Liel Abada left the winger with no choice but to leave the club.
That's the claims of his Israeli ally Avi Luzon, who is the chief of Maccabi Petah Tikva - a former club of Abada.
READ MORE: Liel Abada left no choice but to leave Celtic after 'disgusting' treatment
The attacker, 22, is set to join MLS side FC Charlotte in a £10m deal from the Hoops.
The winger is due to move on from the Scottish champions a little over six months after agreeing a new deal until the summer of 2027.
Brendan Rodgers last month revealed that Abada would not be involved in first-team matters going forward, with the player not in the right frame of mind. This is in relation to the ongoing conflict in the Middle East involving his native land Israel and Palestine.
It's said that an element of the Celtic support who have consistently shown their support of Palestine, by waving flags and displaying banners at games, have contributed to Abada's mindset.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel