It is a strange thing when the prospect of a company releasing a healthy financial report has the potential to make their board squirm with embarrassment.
For Celtic though, the revelation to their supporter base over how much they have tucked away in the bank has the same sort of rage-inducing potential as the recent British Gas results did for the general public.
The Celtic AGM back in November of last year seems a long time ago now. As many who were present on the day remarked, the boasting from the board back then over the £72m they had stashed in their bulging biscuit tin might well come back to haunt them. And so it has proved.
Even then, the executives seemed oblivious that crowing about their cash reserves might provoke questions from supporters over why they weren’t seeing more of that money on the pitch on a matchday.
Now, after yet another disastrous transfer window and the ceding of top spot in the Premiership to Rangers at the weekend, they find themselves in the awkward position of trying to find a way to put a positive spin on the fact the club is, er, absolutely minted.
READ MORE: Celtic urged to ban The Green Brigade for 'End Zionism' banner
Among the boos and the groans in Celtic Park’s Main Stand on Saturday could be overheard gossip about the potential scale of the Celtic bank balance when the imminent interim financial results drop.
Could it be £90m? Even £100m? Rest assured, those speculating about that accumulation of wealth were not doing so with a mind to pat the Celtic board on the back for their frugality. Rather, it was to highlight the insanity of squirreling so much money away when they were witnessing their side visibly wilt under pressure from Kilmarnock.
And also, the very real prospect that they would effectively hand tens of millions more in revenue across the city by squandering the automatic place in next season’s expanded Champions League.
With the greatest of respect to Anthony Ralston, Liam Scales, Stephen Welsh and Greg Taylor, had you said last summer that would be a Celtic starting backline at any point other than in a friendly - barring an injury crisis – you would have been laughed at.
Well, no one at Celtic is laughing now. Yes, Alistair Johnston and Cameron Carter-Vickers, the most important cog in their defence, were missing. But it is in this area of the team where the failings of Celtic’s signing policy, when it doesn’t pay off, are most starkly laid bare.
When Taylor, himself just back from a spell out, tired towards the end of the Kilmarnock game, it was Alexandro Bernabei who came on, and was ultimately caught out for the late Killie equaliser. A player who cost £3.5m or thereabouts, but who has made little to no impact in his time here so far, and it seems has no future at the club either.
Two other signings drafted in to replace the departed Carl Starfelt last summer in a similar price range, Maik Nawrocki and Gustaf Lagerbielke, are also not trusted to start matches ahead of the likes of Welsh and Scales.
No offence to those lads, who are solid enough citizens to have around the squad, but are either of them really good enough to be starting for Celtic on a weekly basis? Given how frail they looked defensively on Saturday, it would appear not.
Further up the pitch, the policy of stockpiling project players over pushing the boat out for certain starters was on display at almost comic levels in the wide areas.
Daizen Maeda played on the right and did next to nothing, Luis Palma played on the left and was hooked at half time, Yang came on to little effect at the break and Nick Kuhn showed up so poorly when he entered the action you now have pundits questioning if he would get a game for Kilmarnock.
Guess which price bracket most of these guys fell into? Kuhn might go on and do well for Celtic in the long run once he finds his feet, but this team needed players in January who could come in and make an immediate impact in the title race. Quality players, as Brendan Rodgers and captain Callum McGregor both stressed. Finished articles.
Even the presence of the one signing who has come in and looked decent in Adam Idah necessitates a disruption of the one part of Celtic’s team that really seemed to be functioning well, their midfield. With Idah and Kyogo Furuhashi taking turns to drop into the area where Paulo Bernardo – now kicking his heels on the bench – was playing with such promise either side of the winter break, the impressive triumvirate of the Portuguese, Matt O’Riley and McGregor has been dismantled.
O’Riley and McGregor are Celtic’s best available players at present. But even they have looked a little off it in recent weeks. Whether that is down to the unfamiliar make-up of the midfield trio, or in O’Riley’s case, the rejected bid from Atletico Madrid in January, nobody really knows.
READ MORE: Crisis meeting called as Celtic lose their fear factor
All we do know for sure is that Celtic have now self-sabotaged an area of their side that did indeed look a cut above the opposition as they attempt to accommodate Idah’s arrival and breathe new life into Kyogo.
Rodgers must take his fair share of responsibility for all of this, but all of these woes can be traced back to the fact that the recruitment has lacked ambition, and in January, has failed to improve the team.
Privately, Celtic are somewhat bemused by the vitriol being aimed at chairman and former chief executive Peter Lawwell over that, given he now has no part to play in the signing of players. Well, apart from his son being the head of recruitment.
What agency that gives him in that area, only they know, but the perception of that dynasty has already led to the fans making up their minds on who is to blame.
And speaking of unhelpful perceptions, news of £90m or thereabouts sitting in the coffers while fans watch a sprinkling of relatively ordinary players throw away the Premiership title is a doozy.
Even if Celtic do manage to negotiate a path to defend their crown from here, that shouldn’t be looked upon as vindication of their methods. Either way, this season of rancour and ropey recruitment has shown that there should be some soul-searching in the summer over the structure and direction of the club.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel