Rangers boss Philippe Clement has addressed the SFA's independent VAR panel review after it revealed the Ibrox side have been involved in five of the 13 incorrect calls.
The League Cup holders were on both sides over the decisions overall with Ross McCausland's penalty win against Livingston deemed incorrect while Jose Cifuentes should not have been sent off vs Dundee and John Souttar's concession of a penalty against Kilmarnock should also not have been given.
And Clement insists there is no point dwelling on the past. He said: "Honestly I didn't see the list because it's the past. And you know I've said to you guys a lot in the past I live in the present and on future.
"But it's good to have transparency which is an important thing and that when faults are made there is communication and we can learn lessons out of that.
"It's the same if I make mistakes. It's very important for football that there's transparency and communication and I think it's important there can be more communication between referees and managers, just two or three times a season outside of games.
"For the moment the only communication is around games where all the tension is. It can be interesting to have discussions about football and the rules, things that happened, maybe in the months that were before that.
READ MORE: Rangers legend Ian McMillan dies aged 92
"To have discussions in respect and a good way that there's less misunderstanding and everybody can have their view. Like this weekend, come to a better product of football.
"And I mean really both sides that managers can talk about something that happened in games that you don't understand why.
"We need to explain to our players why decisions are made afterwards, and referees can say about in the game and also about behaviour of managers.
"I was a little bit too temperamental in the last game, I kicked away a bottle of water and got a yellow card. I understand after why I got a yellow, but if we can have an open discussion afterwards, managers can learn also.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here