Philippe Clement has vowed he would 'quit his job' if he genuinely felt a referee was biased.
Willie Collum will take charge of Rangers' Scottish Cup tie against Ayr United tomorrow evening.
It will be the experienced official's first game involving the Ibrox club since the penalty controversy that surrounded Celtic's 2-1 win over Rangers on December 30.
Rangers were left reeling after VAR, operated by Collum that day, decided to instruct Nick Walsh to wave play on after Alistair Johnson's handball inside Celtic's area.
It was later revealed, from the Scottish FA's point of view, that Abdallah Sima had been flagged for offside in the build-up to the goal.
However, Rangers chiefs met for talks with the SFA's head of refereeing Crawford Allan.
They then lodged an official complaint to the SFA & SPFL by requesting that Collum should not be involved in officiating any future Rangers fixtures.
Of course, this was thrown out by the governing bodies, as they stuck by the referee.
And he's due to return to Ibrox tomorrow for the first time since the Old Firm derby incident, as Scott Brown takes his Ayr United side to Glasgow.
Clement has backed Collum, insisting he has no issues with the SFA's decision to appoint him to a Rangers game.
READ MORE: Tom Lawrence to miss Rangers' clash vs Ayr as a 'precaution'
He said: "I am happy to be honest. When there is one moment that I would think a referee is not neutral I would directly quit my job. So I am happy we can leave the past behind us."
The Belgian then revealed he played no part in the request made by Rangers over Collum.
He added: "No. That is something for in the club and we've talked about it. But that will happen in the future, yes."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel