Steven Naismith has insisted he is not aware of any feedback from Lawrence Shankland's representatives over the contract offer tabled by Hearts.
Reports have suggested the new deal on the table won't be enough to convince Shankland to pen fresh terms at Tynecastle.
However, Naismith brushed off questions on Shankland's future as he insisted discussions are a "process" and matters will reach a natural conclusion.
On whether he's aware of any feedback to the contract offer, Naimsith simply stated: "No."
Quizzed on the reports the offer is not good enough, he added: "That's for Shanks to decide if that's the case or not. When you get to the endpoint, we will do what we can physically do.
"Players who run their contracts down potentially have opportunities and offers which aren't there when you are under contract.
READ MORE: Spartans 1 Hearts 2: Gordon back in action as Jambos scrape through
"He's got 18 months left, we have started speaking to him about a new deal, we will get to an endpoint and see where that takes us.
"It's a process and, inevitably, we will get to the endpoint. The club will do all we can to keep him and it's a big decision for him. He will take as long as he needs to decide."
Scotland international Shankland missed the Scottish Cup win over Spartans due to a sickness bug with the player advised to stay away from the club as to avoid spreading the illness to the squad.
"Yeah, it is," said Naismith on Shankland's absence being one for conspiracy theorists over a possible exit. "He hasn't been about for the last few days so we will see how he is. I don't know whether he will make Tuesday or not. We will wait and see.
"He's been ill for two days. On the advice of the medical staff, he hasn't been in the building because he isn't wanting to spread it."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel