Mark Dodson has talked a good game since his earliest months as Scottish Rugby’s chief executive, and he was true to form yesterday as he discussed his decision - “entirely my own” - to quit the post after a dozen dizzying years.
That £10.5million loss in the SRU’s last set of accounts? “The business is performing really, really well.”
The withering away of the club game and the lack of talent coming through from under-20 level? “I think the foundations are in good shape.”
The failure by the Scotland Men’s team to reach the knockout stages at the last two Rugby World Cups? “I’ve had great faith in Gregor [Townsend] since I appointed him coach.”
There have been times during his tenure, particularly when he took the floor to address an annual general meeting, when it felt like if you listened to Dodson long enough and without thinking too hard, you would end up believing every word he said. The art of persuasion has always been one of his strong points, and since he took up office back in 2011 he has spent a long time trying to persuade us that everything is rosy in Scottish Rugby’s garden.
At times, indeed, some elements within the sport have been flourishing. But at other times, especially over the past two years or so, it has become obvious that other aspects have started to fester. And the blame for that has increasingly been laid at Dodson’s door.
READ MORE: Scottish Rugby chief executive Dodson set to step down this summer
If there is one thing that turned the tide of public opinion against the bluff Mancunian, it was the governing body’s disgraceful reaction, led if not dictated by Dodson, to the death of Siobhan Cattigan. A serving international passed away in tragic circumstances, and the chief executive of the sporting organisation she had represented was unable to display even a modicum of empathy. In fact, worse than his inability to show some human decency, Dodson went on to display an indecent self-regard as he refused, time after time, to admit he might, just might, have got anything wrong in his behaviour.
In that, as in so many other ways, Dodson knew he had the backing of John Jeffrey, the former international who, as Scottish Rugby chairman up until May 2022, was a close and powerful ally. Between them, the pair were able to wield a lot of influence over some other board members, so when Jeffrey left to take up a new post as World Rugby’s vice-chairman, Dodson’s power was diminished.
It has continued to wane since John McGuigan’s advent as chairman of the governing body. Calm, tactful and diplomatic he may be, but McGuigan also has a forensic intellect; one which appears altogether immune to Dodson’s bluster and braggadocio.
On an individual, private level, it should be said, Dodson can be a good laugh. Unlike so many people who are happy to be blunt in their assessment of others, he can take the criticism as well as dishing it out. The electability of politicians is often assessed by the question “Would I enjoy going for a pint with them?”, and the answer in Dodson’s case is yes, you would.
So he is not all bad as a person - far from it. And it would be a gross simplification to say he has been all bad as a chief executive over the 13 years and counting since he took up office.
But he will leave Scottish Rugby in a parlous state at so many levels. And, given that and the obscenely inflated remuneration he received, the bottom line on Mark Dodson’s time in office is surely that he enriched himself while impoverishing the sport.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel