Feyenoord star Ramiz Zerrouki has claimed that even Celtic defender Liam Scales admitted they shouldn't have got a penalty during their Champions League triumph.
The Hoops finally got a win in the group stages of the competition - their first home victory in ten years - when they defeated the Rotterdam side 2-1.
They went ahead through a first half penalty from Luis Palma after defender Scales was wrestled by Zerrouki in the area, before fellow stopper Gustaf Lagerbielke grabbed a late winner after the Dutch side had equalised.
But Algerian international midfielder Zerrouki was surprised at the ref's decision to penalise him for his tussle with Scales.
He said: "We have some contact with each other, but in my opinion much too light for a penalty.
"Initially the referee warned us, then the corner is taken and he pushed me first and I have some contact with him.
"Even that Celtic player said to me that he didn't think it was a penalty, so I think it says it all.
"You always have learning moments, but in the end, I thought we should have won this match. We just weren't good enough in finishing.
"We were the better team and created the biggest chances, but we didn't finish them."
And colleague Mats Wieffer couldn't believe they had lost the match.
He said: "Everyone is very frustrated. Celtic were better in the first 20 minutes and then we had it pretty much under control. We created a lot of chances, especially in the second half.
"I don't know how many goals we have conceded like the one Celtic scored late on in the Champions League, but that's not possible. It's actually scandalous.
"These are the moments you train to prevent when everyone has a man. This should not happen.
"It's all very well saying we played nice football and should have won, but if that happens time and time again, you will never win anything.
"We can only blame ourselves."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel