VAR did Hibernian out a place in the Viaplay Cup final next month, according to former player Tam McManus.
The ex-Hibs attacker believes his old club should have been victorious against Aberdeen at Hampden on Saturday. Barry Robson's men in the end defeated Nick Montgomery's side 1-0 thanks to a Bojan Miovski strike.
But Martin Boyle thought he had fired Hibs into the lead during the second half. He broke clear of the Dons defence after some route one football from Will Fish. Boyle finished past Kelle Roos nicely, which sparked wild celebrations amongst the Hibs faithful in the stands.
However, VAR reviewed the incident and after a lengthy stoppage, it was concluded that Boyle was marginally offside, and so referee John Beaton ruled the goal out.
McManus was left reeling over the decision. He insists it should have been his former club that prevailed in the semi, not Aberdeen.
"Suckered. Sickened. Screwed over. Three ways to describe Hibs semi-final defeat to Aberdeen - a result that unfortunately is going to stick in the throat for Hibees for quite a while," he wrote in his Daily Record column.
"I totally understand that fans are frustrated with the results and it was definitely a massive opportunity missed. But the truth is that VAR has cost Hibs a place in the cup final. Simple as that. And it’s starting to cost football moments of real genius.
"Four days on and I still can’t understand why they gave offside against Martin Boyle. The fact they took three minutes to come to the decision tells you everything that they couldn’t be sure. So why give it?
READ MORE: Barry Robson answered Aberdeen critics in wins over Motherwell & Hibs
"It was another horrible example of spontaneity being drained from the game by VAR. It was a wonderful touch and finish by Boyle. A really great goal. That’s what football is all about. People pay their money or turn on TV to see moments like that.
"Boyle was onside as far as I’m concerned. Football is an entertainment sport and you want to see goals. Three minutes to decide to rule that moment of brilliance out? That is an absolute joke. If it’s taking that long to make a decision then the truth is he’s more than likely not offside.
"Hands up, a year or so ago I was in the camp to bring VAR in because I was so sick of the moaning over decisions. But now it’s here I’d be happy to see the back of it tomorrow. Particularly in the case of offsides. The attacker has to be given the benefit of the doubt.
"I’d read that FIFA were trialling a concept that would see a player only being offside if every goalscoring part of his body was beyond the last defender - basically clear daylight. I’d back that 100 per cent. If it was that way now Hibs would be in the Viaplay Cup Final because if they’d got their noses in front they wouldn’t lose that game. Simple as that.
"It was a huge turning point and then to rub salt in the wounds they should have had a penalty too. Look at the Rangers penalty against Hearts a day later which was pretty similar.
"Fair play to Aberdeen for a smash-and-grab job but Hibs can take positives even though it doesn’t feel like it. The signs are there that Nick Montgomery knows what he is trying to do - and they weren’t there under the previous manager.
"But that’s six without a win now but it’s been a really hard run of games with Celtic, Rangers and Hearts in there as well as the semi-final. Montgomery needs to start picking up results though. And tonight in Paisley would be a great place to start."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here