Brendan Rodgers was unimpressed by the decision to disallow two Celtic goals against Ross County.
The Scottish champions ran out 3-0 winners in the highlands thanks to strikes from David Turnbull, Luis Palma and James Forrest.
Liam Scales thought he had put the visitors in front in Dingwall but his finish was chopped off after Oh Hyeon-gyu was judged to have fouled a Ross County player in the build-up.
Then South Korea international himself then had a goal disallowed when Daizen Maeda was ruled to be offside before playing in the cross.
And while Rodgers was pleased with his side's performance, he feels they unfairly missed out on a higher scoreline.
Speaking to Sky Sports, he said: "I thought we created a lot of chances and had some goals disallowed that I would need to see again, especially the offside and even the one before that early on.
"You have two guys jumping for the ball and the ball lands and we finish, and it is not given as a goal. I did not see that as a good decision, but the guys kept going and persevering."
READ MORE: Reason for delay over David Turnbull Celtic deal explained
The Northern Irishman made six changes from the side that defeated St Mirren midweek and he was keen to stress the importance of squad management ahead of the trip to Spain to face Atletico Madrid in Champions League action.
"It is just about trying to manage the game time of the players just to make sure we are as fresh as we can be," he continued.
"With all the changes it was a little bit slow at times I felt but in the main we had some really good combination play.
"You are never totally comfortable in the game till you get that second goal."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here