The Scottish FA have not asked UEFA to release the VAR audio from Thursday night's loss to Spain - simply because they didn't think they would get it.
Scotland lost 2-0 in Seville as Spain cut the gap at the top of Group A to just three points as both sides aim to qualify for next summer's European champions.
But the result came in highly controversial fashion during the second half of the match.
Scott McTominay hit a sensational free-kick into the far right corner of Unai Simon's goal to give the Scots the lead. The travelling support went wild as the ball flew into the net.
However, after a few minutes, VAR advised referee Serdar Gozubuyuk to check the goal. Initially, this was for a foul by Jack Hendry on the goalkeeper, but later on in the evening, UEFA confirmed the decision to disallow to goal was actually because of an offside.
Yesterday, the SFA opted to seek answers from UEFA over exactly why McTominay's strike was chopped off.
But president Mike Mulraney, who revealed they are still waiting for a response from the governing body, says they stopped short of asking for the audio.
READ MORE: How and when can Scotland qualify for Euro 2024 in Germany?
Asked on BBC Sportsound if they requested the VAR audio, he responded: "Part of the reason we've not asked for the audio is that we probably wouldn't have got it. As for audio disclosure, I think there's a process going on in football with VAR and in my opinion, one day we'll see audio being released.
"We're on a learning curve with VAR. Scotland's only one year into it, we've seen other nations very close by who have had major controversies many years into it. We've got a process, we think we're getting there and improving.
"There's always going to be human error, whether you're playing it or refereeing it. VAR reduces the probability significantly. It's a process but we'll get better as it develops. But I think we will get to a point where it is released."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel